Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 30;24(1):51.
doi: 10.1186/s12938-025-01381-w.

Advances in 3D-printed scaffold technologies for bone defect repair: materials, biomechanics, and clinical prospects

Jie Sun #  1 , Cao Chen #  1 , Bo Zhang  1 , Chen Yao  2 , Yafeng Zhang  3
Affiliations
Review

Advances in 3D-printed scaffold technologies for bone defect repair: materials, biomechanics, and clinical prospects

Jie Sun et al. Biomed Eng Online. .

Abstract

The treatment of large bone defects remains a significant clinical challenge due to the limitations of current grafting techniques, including donor site morbidity, restricted availability, and suboptimal integration. Recent advances in 3D bioprinting technology have enabled the fabrication of structurally and functionally optimized scaffolds that closely mimic native bone tissue architecture. This review comprehensively examines the latest developments in 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration, focusing on three critical aspects: (1) material selection and composite design encompassing metallic; (2) structural optimization with hierarchical porosity (macro/micro/nano-scale) and biomechanical properties tailored; (3) biological functionalization through growth factor delivery, cell seeding strategies and surface modifications. We critically analyze scaffold performance metrics from different research applications, while discussing current translational barriers, including vascular network establishment, mechanical stability under load-bearing conditions, and manufacturing scalability. The review concludes with a forward-looking perspective on innovative approaches such as 4D dynamic scaffolds, smart biomaterials with stimuli-responsive properties, and the integration of artificial intelligence for patient-specific design optimization. These technological advancements collectively offer unprecedented opportunities to address unmet clinical needs in complex bone reconstruction.

Keywords: 3D printing; Biomaterials; Bone defect; Bone regeneration; Bone tissue engineering; Scaffold.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The procedure of 3D printing technology. R&D: release and delivery
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Main properties required for bone tissue regeneration scaffolds. a Biological function of ideal bone tissue regeneration scaffold. b Characteristics of ideal bone tissue regeneration scaffold
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fu R, Liu C, Yan Y, Li Q, Huang RL. Bone defect reconstruction via endochondral ossification: a developmental engineering strategy. J Tissue Eng. 2021;12:22–43. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen ZY, Gao S, Zhang YW, Zhou RB, Zhou F. Antibacterial biomaterials in bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(11):2594–612. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller CP, Chiodo CP. Autologous bone graft in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankl Clin. 2016;21(4):825–37. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmidt AH. Autologous bone graft: is it still the gold standard? Injury. 2021;52(Suppl 2):S18–22. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Myeroff C, Archdeacon M. Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(23):2227–36. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources