Stakeholder perspectives on hearing conservation programmes in the South African mining sector: A qualitative study
- PMID: 40301966
- PMCID: PMC12039132
- DOI: 10.1186/s12961-025-01326-8
Stakeholder perspectives on hearing conservation programmes in the South African mining sector: A qualitative study
Abstract
Purpose: Stakeholders play a crucial role in the success of complex interventions, such as hearing conservation programmes (HCPs), where their active participation directly impacts outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the views of various stakeholders, involved in occupational noise management, in the mining sector in South Africa.
Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted, recruiting 16 participants through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Participants represented diverse roles, including Mine Health and Safety officials, audiologists, ventilation and occupational health engineers and an occupational hygiene assistant. In-depth interviews were conducted to gather data, which were later analysed using inductive thematic analysis to identify emerging themes.
Results: The in-depth interviews revealed six prominent themes that shed light on both the facilitators and barriers to achieving desired milestones in the implementation of HCPs. These themes were crisis management; some are more equal than others; we have tried, but then reality intervenes; cost of an individual's hearing; knowledge is power; and show and tell.
Conclusion: Achieving milestones requires a comprehensive and systematic approach, fostering collaborative engagement among all stakeholders in the mining industry. By viewing and treating HCPs as complex interventions, occupational healthcare can be improved for individuals exposed to excessive noise in the workplace. The study highlights the need for careful consideration of stakeholder perspectives to ensure the feasibility and effectiveness of interventions aimed at eliminating excessive noise in the mining industry.
Keywords: Complex interventions; Hearing conservation programmes; Mine health and safety milestones; Occupational noise; Stakeholders.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical clearance was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa (Protocol Number: M160264). Participants gave written consent after reading and understanding the participants’ information sheet. All identifying information was removed in the presentation of the findings. Consent for publication: Participants consented, as this information was included in the information sheet. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
Similar articles
-
Management of occupational noise induced hearing loss in the mining sector in South Africa: Where are the audiologists?J Occup Health. 2018 Sep 26;60(5):376-382. doi: 10.1539/joh.2018-0020-OA. Epub 2018 Jul 6. J Occup Health. 2018. PMID: 29984739 Free PMC article.
-
Risk versus benefit: Should not audiologists assess this in the context of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the mining industry?S Afr J Commun Disord. 2020 Mar 3;67(2):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.671. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2020. PMID: 32129658 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent advances in hearing conservation programmes: A systematic review.S Afr J Commun Disord. 2020 Mar 3;67(2):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.675. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2020. PMID: 32129659 Free PMC article.
-
Occupational noise induced hearing loss in the mining sector in South Africa: Perspectives from occupational health practitioners on how mineworkers are trained.S Afr J Commun Disord. 2020 Mar 30;67(2):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.676. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2020. PMID: 32242443 Free PMC article.
-
Occupational noise-induced hearing loss in South African large-scale mines: exploring hearing conservation programmes as complex interventions embedded in a realist approach.Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Dec;26(4):753-761. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1498183. Epub 2018 Aug 23. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020. PMID: 29987970
References
-
- Bauer E, Babich D. Administrative controls for reducing worker noise exposures. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2005.
-
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
-
- Brereton P, Patel J. Buy quiet as a means of reducing workplace noise. Acoustics Aust. 2016;44(1):55–65.
-
- Bruce RD. Engineering controls for reducing workplace noise. Noise Eng. 2007;37(3).
-
- Cai X, Jiang W, Song H, Xie H. Pay for performance schemes and manufacturing worker productivity: evidence from a kinked design in China. J Dev Econ. 2022;156: 102840.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical