Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 14:14:e73517.
doi: 10.2196/73517.

Ethical Challenges and Opportunities of AI in End-of-Life Palliative Care: Integrative Review

Abel García Abejas  1   2 , David Geraldes Santos  3 , Fabio Leite Costa  1 , Aida Cordero Botejara  1 , Helder Mota-Filipe  4 , Àngels Salvador Vergés  5
Affiliations
Review

Ethical Challenges and Opportunities of AI in End-of-Life Palliative Care: Integrative Review

Abel García Abejas et al. Interact J Med Res. .

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into palliative medicine, offering opportunities to improve quality, efficiency, and patient-centeredness in end-of-life care. However, its use raises complex ethical issues, including privacy, equity, dehumanization, and decision-making dilemmas.

Objective: We aim to critically analyze the main ethical implications of AI in end-of-life palliative care and examine the benefits and risks. We propose strategies for ethical and responsible implementation.

Methods: We conducted an integrative review of studies published from 2020 to 2025 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, identified through systematic searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were studies addressing AI in palliative medicine focusing on ethical implications or patient experience. Two reviewers independently performed study selection and data extraction, resolving discrepancies by consensus. The quality of the papers was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and the Hawker et al tool.

Results: Six key themes emerged: (1) practical applications of AI, (2) communication and AI tools, (3) patient experience and humanization, (4) ethical implications, (5) quality of life perspectives, and (6) challenges and limitations. While AI shows promise for improving efficiency and personalization, consolidated real-world examples of efficiency and equity remain scarce. Key risks include algorithmic bias, cultural insensitivity, and the potential for reduced patient autonomy.

Conclusions: AI can transform palliative care, but implementation must be patient-centered and ethically grounded. Robust policies are needed to ensure equity, privacy, and humanization. Future research should address data diversity, social determinants, and culturally sensitive approaches.

Keywords: artificial intelligence (AI); end-of-life care; ethical implications; palliative medicine; patient-centred care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram illustrating the study selection process. The diagram shows the number of records identified, duplicates removed, records screened, full-text papers assessed, and studies included in the review. Adapted from the PRISMA 2020 Statement [15].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bozkurt S, Fereydooni S, Kar I, Diop Chalmers C, Leslie SL, Pathak R, Walling A, Lindvall C, Lorenz K, Quest T, Giannitrapani K, Kavalieratos D. Investigating data diversity and model robustness of AI applications in palliative care and hospice: protocol for scoping review. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024;13:e56353. doi: 10.2196/56353. https://www.researchprotocols.org/2024//e56353/ v13i1e56353 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miralles F. La transformación de la salud mediante uso de datos e inteligencia artificial: ámbitos de aplicación, retos científico-tecnológicos y claves para la adopción. Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas. 2023. [2025-05-03]. https://www.fundaciogrifols.org/documents/4438882/5272129/Q63_inteligenc... .
    1. Windisch P, Hertler C, Blum D, Zwahlen D, Förster R. Leveraging advances in artificial intelligence to improve the quality and timing of palliative care. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(5):1149. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051149. https://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=cancers12051149 cancers12051149 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tei S, Fujino J. Artificial intelligence, internet addiction, and palliative care. Eur. Psychiatr. 2024;67(S1):S339. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.700. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383483341_Artificial_intelligen... - DOI
    1. Ferrario A, Gloeckler S, Biller-Andorno N. Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice. J Med Ethics. 2023;49(3):165–174. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108371. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/36347603 jme-2022-108371 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources