Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Sep;33(5):2211-2219.
doi: 10.1177/09287329251330722. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

Advancing post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation through high-frequency neurostimulation: A retrospective evaluation of cortical excitability and biomarker modulation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Advancing post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation through high-frequency neurostimulation: A retrospective evaluation of cortical excitability and biomarker modulation

Ke Wang et al. Technol Health Care. 2025 Sep.

Expression of concern in

  • Expression of concern.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Technol Health Care. 2025 Nov 12:9287329251392360. doi: 10.1177/09287329251392360. Online ahead of print. Technol Health Care. 2025. PMID: 41223024 No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) poses significant challenges to patient independence, yet technological interventions like high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remain underexplored in clinical neurorehabilitation.

Objective: This study evaluates the integration of high-frequency rTMS into standard care, focusing on its technological efficacy in modulating neuroplasticity and serum biomarkers to enhance cognitive and functional recovery.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 80 PSCI patients (2021-2023) compared outcomes between a conventional care group (n = 30) and an rTMS group (n = 50) receiving 20 Hz stimulation (YRD-CCY-I device) targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Key metrics included Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Barthel Index (BI), cortical silent period (CL), central motor conduction time (CMCT), and serum neurotrophic factors (BDNF, VEGF, IGF-1).

Results: Post-intervention, the rTMS group demonstrated superior MoCA scores (19.25 vs. 15.24, p = 0.001), BI (76.36 vs. 70.13, p = 0.001), and IADL (20.38 vs. 18.13, p = 0.001) compared to controls. Neurophysiological markers revealed prolonged CL (25.30 vs. 24.02 ms, p = 0.001) and shortened CMCT (12.05 vs. 12.98 ms, p = 0.001), alongside elevated BDNF (9.56 vs. 7.34 ng/mL), VEGF (156.48 vs. 110.54 pg/mL), and IGF-1 (153.74 vs. 112.90 ng/mL, p = 0.001). Overall efficacy was 94% for rTMS versus 73.33% for conventional care (p = 0.047).

Conclusion: High-frequency rTMS, as a targeted neurostimulation technology, enhances cognitive recovery and cortical adaptability in PSCI by modulating neuroplasticity and upregulating neurotrophic biomarkers. These findings underscore its potential as a scalable adjunct in technology-driven neurorehabilitation programs.

Keywords: Neurostimulation technology; cognitive recovery; cortical biomarkers; stroke rehabilitation; transcranial magnetic stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources