doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10415-2.
Epub 2025 Apr 30.
Genome Editing Should Preferably Be Carried Out on Fetuses In Utero Rather Than IVF Embryos
Affiliations
- PMID: 40304838
- DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10415-2
Item in Clipboard
Genome Editing Should Preferably Be Carried Out on Fetuses In Utero Rather Than IVF Embryos
J Bioeth Inq.
2025 Jun.
No abstract available
Keywords: Defect; Ethics; Fetal; Gene therapy; Monogenic disorders; Preimplantation embryo.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical Declaration: No human subjects or laboratory animals were utilized. Conflict of Interests: None.
Similar articles
-
Stringent criteria needed for germline genome editing of human IVF embryos.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jul;41(7):1727-1731. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03125-6. Epub 2024 May 2. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 38695986 Free PMC article.
-
Day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 24;11(11):CD013233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013233.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36423200 Free PMC article.
-
Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub3. PMID: 15495053 Updated.
-
Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD005291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9:CD005291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3. PMID: 16437524 Updated.
-
Prenatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia for improving outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD008925. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008925.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26611822 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Khan, S., and K. Drabiak. 2024. Eight strategies to engineer acceptance of human germline modifications. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 21(1): 81–94. - PubMed
-
- Kubikova, N., M. Esbert, S. Titus, et al. 2023. Deficiency of DNA double-strand break repair in human preimplantation embryos revealed by CRISPR-Cas9. Human Reproduction 38(S1): dead093.089.
-
- Liang, P., Y. Xu, X. Zhang, et al. 2015. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein & Cell 6(5): 363–372.
-
- Madero, J.I., M.C. Manotas, M. García-Acero, A. López Cáceres, and J.C. López. 2023. Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction. Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology 75(3): 260–272. - PubMed
-
- Mattar, C.N.Z., M.K. Labude, T.N. Lee, and P.S. Lai. 2021. Ethical considerations of preconception and prenatal gene modification in the embryo and fetus. Human Reproduction 36(12): 3018–3027. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
