A bibliometric mapping of advancements and trends in genome editing in pigs
- PMID: 40304841
- DOI: 10.1007/s11250-025-04432-5
A bibliometric mapping of advancements and trends in genome editing in pigs
Abstract
Researchers have widely undertaken targeted genome editing in pigs to optimize pig productivity, disease tolerance and for biomedical research. The present study aimed to investigate research advancements, focus areas, gaps, and challenges in genome editing in pigs using bibliometric analysis. The bibliographic information of publications on genome editing in pigs from 2010 to 2023 was retrieved from the Scopus database. Bibliometric parameters, such as coauthorship, keyword co-occurrence, citation, bibliographic coupling, and cocitation, was analyzed using VOSviewer. Literature mining was conducted to evaluate the emerging areas and challenges in the development of genome-edited pigs. We found 725 documents on genome editing in pigs, 407 of which were research articles authored by 2826 researchers from 1359 research organizations across 40 countries. The two countries, China and the United States, account for more than 50% of the research publications on genome editing in pigs. Investigations on the optimization of the procedure, delivery methods, editing efficiency, and reducing off-target effects dominated the early phase of research, which has shifted to its application for generating knockout (KO) or knockin (KI) pigs in recent years. Areas such as xenotransplantation, disease resistance, higher muscling, and disease models have dominated the research horizon for genome editing in pigs. Emerging areas in gene editing include base editing, CRISPR-based screens, diagnostics, and therapeutics. However, investigations on reducing heat stress and environmental footprint through genetic alterations need more attention from scientists. Challenges such as off-target effects and regulatory, ethical and societal issues related to channelizing gene-edited pigs from lab to land and then from farm to fork continue to restrain this field.
Keywords: Bibliometric; CRISPR; Disease resistance; Genome editing; Knockout; Pig; Research trend; Xenotransplantation.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The author(s) declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Genome Editing of Pig.Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1630:121-139. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7128-2_11. Methods Mol Biol. 2017. PMID: 28643255
-
Molecular breeding of pigs in the genome editing era.Genet Sel Evol. 2025 Mar 10;57(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12711-025-00961-7. Genet Sel Evol. 2025. PMID: 40065264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oocyte electroporation prior to in vitro fertilization is an efficient method to generate single, double, and multiple knockout porcine embryos of interest in biomedicine and animal production.Theriogenology. 2024 Apr 1;218:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.01.040. Epub 2024 Feb 1. Theriogenology. 2024. PMID: 38320372
-
The advancements, challenges, and future implications of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in swine research.J Genet Genomics. 2021 May 20;48(5):347-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 May 11. J Genet Genomics. 2021. PMID: 34144928 Review.
-
CRISPR Technology Acts as a Dual-Purpose Tool in Pig Breeding: Enhancing Both Agricultural Productivity and Biomedical Applications.Biomolecules. 2024 Nov 5;14(11):1409. doi: 10.3390/biom14111409. Biomolecules. 2024. PMID: 39595585 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Anand RP, Layer JV, Heja D, Hirose T, Lassiter G, Firl DJ, Paragas VB, Akkad A, Chhangawala S, Colvin RB, Ernst RJ, Esch N, Getchell K, Griffin AK, Guo X, Hall KC, Hamilton P, Kalekar LA, Kan Y, Karadagi A, Li F, Low SC, Matheson R, Nehring C, Otsuka R, Pandelakis M, Policastro RA, Pols R, Queiroz L, Rosales IA, Serkin WT, Stiede K, Tomosugi T, Xue Y, Zentner GE, Angeles-Albores D, Chris Chao J, Crabtree JN, Harken S, Hinkle N, Lemos T, Li M, Pantano L, Stevens D, Subedar OD, Tan X, Yin S, Anwar IJ, Aufhauser D, Capuano S, Kaufman DB, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J, Shanmuganayagam D, Markmann JF, Church GM, Curtis M, Kawai T, Youd ME, Qin W (2023) Design and testing of a humanized porcine donor for xenotransplantation. Nature 622:393–401 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
-
- Bharati J, Punetha M, Sai Kumar BAA, Vidyalakshmi GM, Sarkar M, D’Occhio MJ, Singh RK (2020) Genome editing in animals: an overview. In: Genomics and biotechnological advances in veterinary, poultry, and fisheries. Elsevier, 75–104
-
- Bharati J, De K, Paul S, Kumar S, Yadav AK, Doley J, Mohan NH, Das BC (2022) Mobilizing pig resources for capacity development and livelihood security. In: Agriculture, livestock production and aquaculture. Springer, 219–242
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous