Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2025 May;53(5):817-830.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01324-y. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

Considering Historical Context, Current Societal Trends, and Implications for Understanding Harm in Youth Mental Health Treatment: A Broader Lens to the Primum Non Nocere Special Issue

Affiliations
Editorial

Considering Historical Context, Current Societal Trends, and Implications for Understanding Harm in Youth Mental Health Treatment: A Broader Lens to the Primum Non Nocere Special Issue

Wendy K Silverman et al. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 May.

Abstract

Potential for harm or non-beneficence in psychological treatments remains understudied compared to questions of benefit or efficacy, especially in youth populations. Further study is critical for upholding the ethical mandate to both maximize salutary outcomes and minimize harm/non-beneficence. In the present special issue, authors of target articles incisively delineate parameters of harm and associated clinical strategies for measuring and addressing it, along with recommendations for research advancing understanding of harm in youth mental health treatment. In this commentary, we synthesize key points across the articles and offer future directions for advancing knowledge on treatment harm. First, we provide historical context that includes the origins of the concept of Primum non nocere, its initial linkages with clinical psychology, and controversies relating to the scientific study of psychotherapy. Second, we leverage lessons learned from the evidence-based treatment movement to advance the study of harm. We suggest that research aimed at advancing understanding harm in youth treatment ought to transpire concurrently with research examining putative benefits of such interventions, including a deliberate focus on mechanisms and moderators of both benefit and harm. Third, we identify several contemporary societal trends relevant to our understanding of harm, including current skepticism of science and proliferation of pseudoscientific interventions. We conclude by discussing implications for furthering knowledge of potential harms in youth mental health treatment across the domains of theory, research, and dissemination. We hope this special issue and commentary stimulate further thought and research in this heretofore understudied area.

Keywords: Adverse event; Evidence-based treatment; Harm; Non-beneficence; Psychotherapy; Youth psychological disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical Standards. Ethical Approval: Since this article was a conceptual/theoretical review, no data were collected. Thus, Institutional Review Board approval was not necessary. Informed Consent: Since this article was a conceptual/theoretical review, informed consent was not applicable, as no data were collected from participants. Conflicts of Interest: Due to his role as guest editor of the special issue in which this article is to be published, Dr. Samuel Spencer had no involvement in the peer review process of this article. All other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Similar articles

References

    1. American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (2025). AACAP clinical practice guidelines. Retrieved on 03/24/2025 from: https://www.aacap.org/aacap/Resources_for_Primary_Care/Practice_Paramete...
    1. American Psychological Association. (1947). Committee on training in clinical psychology. Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 2, 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058236 - DOI
    1. American Psychological Association, Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271 - DOI
    1. American Psychological Association (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
    1. Barkham, M., Lutz, W., & Castonguay, L. G. (Eds.). (2021). Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc

LinkOut - more resources