Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0321422.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321422. eCollection 2025.

PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to access among American Indian/Alaska Native people in the US: Results from an online survey

Affiliations

PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to access among American Indian/Alaska Native people in the US: Results from an online survey

Sarah T Roberts et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Compared to non-Indigenous communities, American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) people are inequitably impacted by HIV, yet few data are available on barriers to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use in this population. This study sought to examine PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to use among AI/AN people in the United States.

Methods: A cross-sectional, online survey was administered from January-May 2023 to respondents ≥ 16 years of age who identified as AI/AN. The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, PrEP knowledge, attitudes towards PrEP, and experiences with and barriers to PrEP use. Sociodemographic correlates of PrEP knowledge and attitudes were identified using bivariable and multivariable regression models.

Results: The survey enrolled 403 participants and 354 (87.8%) completed all questions. Respondents had relatively low PrEP knowledge (mean score 4.0 of 9, standard deviation [SD] 3.0). Few (7%) had ever used PrEP. Mean scores on the stigma scales were 2.1 of 5 for stigmatizing PrEP attitudes (SD 0.7), 2.4 of 5 for anticipated stigma (SD 0.56), and 3.0 of 5 for perceived stigma (SD 0.38). Among non-users, 43.1% were not sure if they would be able to get a PrEP prescription if they desired, and 2.7% believed they would not be able to get one. The most common perceived barriers were not knowing where to get PrEP (54.7%) and concerns around discomfort, judgement, and privacy at the health facility (27.3%). In adjusted models, living on tribal/reservation lands was significantly associated with lower PrEP knowledge, higher stigmatizing attitudes, and higher anticipated stigma, and lower PrEP knowledge was associated with higher stigmatizing attitudes and anticipated stigma. Age, gender identity, sexual orientation, urban residence, and strength of connection to indigenous culture were also significantly correlated with one or more outcomes.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the need for widespread sensitization about PrEP in Indigenous communities and for strategies to improve PrEP access and reduce stigma from providers and community members.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

References

    1. NABS-Newsletter-2020-7-1-spreads.pdf. Available: https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.187/ee8.a33.myftpupload.com/wp-co...
    1. Mako S. Cultural Genocide and Key International Instruments: Framing the Indigenous Experience. Rochester, NY; 2012. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2087175
    1. 751 Unmarked Graves Discovered Near Former Indigenous School in Canada | Smart News| Smithsonian Magazine. [cited 2022 Jul 27]. Available: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/751-unmarked-graves-discovered....
    1. Heart MYHB, Chase J, Elkins J, Altschul DB. Historical trauma among Indigenous Peoples of the Americas: concepts, research, and clinical considerations. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2011;43(4):282–90. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2011.628913 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whitt L, Clarke AW. North American Genocides: Indigenous Nations, Settler Colonialism, and International Law. Cambridge University Press; 2019.