Urinary microbiota in patients with kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40306588
- DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107641
Urinary microbiota in patients with kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The global prevalence of kidney stones (KS) has been on the rise in recent years. Numerous studies have suggested an association between urine microbes and KS, although the precise underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This meta-analysis and systematic review aim to investigate the urine microbiota composition in patients with KS and delineate the disparities in urine microbiota between healthy individuals and KS patients.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Seven studies were selected for analysis to compare the urinary microbiota profiles of KS patients with controls. This research adhered to the PRISMA guidelines, with data extraction performed independently by two researchers. The study outcomes focused on assessing differences in the α-diversity index of urinary microbiota between KS patients and healthy controls, as well as discrepancies in microbiota abundance at the phylum, genus, and species levels. Statistical analyses were carried out using Review Manager 5.4.1 and Stata 17.0 software. The I2 statistic was utilized to evaluate result heterogeneity, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed through funnel plots and Egger's tests. This study is registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42024506599).
Results: We have searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science and analyzed statistics by using Review Manager 5.4.1 and Stata 17.0 software. Our research has included seven articles with a total of 162 kidney stone patients and 139 healthy controls. Based on our results, compared to healthy controls, the α-diversity of KS patients including Shannon index is significantly lower (SMD -0.55, 95 % CI, -1.10∼ -0.01). However, the relative abundances of Acinetobacter, Pseudomonadota and Corynebacterium of patients are higher than healthy controls, while the abundances of Bacilliota and Bacteroides are lower.
Conclusion: The meta-analysis and systematic review has indicated that the urinary microbiota is not only different between patients with KS and healthy people, but also relates to the pathogenesis of kidney stones. The results suggests that diet modification or appropriate use of antibiotics may effectively prevent the development of KS.
Keywords: Kidney stones; Systematic review and meta-analysis; Urine microbiota; α-diversity.
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Profiling the urinary microbiome in men with calcium-based kidney stones.BMC Microbiol. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01734-6. BMC Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32111156 Free PMC article.
-
The urinary microbiota composition and functionality of calcium oxalate stone formers.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jun 7;14:1394955. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1394955. eCollection 2024. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38912208 Free PMC article.
-
Gut microbiota in patients with kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Microbiol. 2023 May 19;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02891-0. BMC Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37208622 Free PMC article.
-
The gut microbiota profile of adults with kidney disease and kidney stones: a systematic review of the literature.BMC Nephrol. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01805-w. BMC Nephrol. 2020. PMID: 32503496 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical