Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 4;45(23):e0404252025.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0404-25.2025.

Cerebellar Activity Affects Distal Cortical Physiology and Synaptic Plasticity in a Human Parietal-Motor Pathway Associated with Motor Actions

Affiliations

Cerebellar Activity Affects Distal Cortical Physiology and Synaptic Plasticity in a Human Parietal-Motor Pathway Associated with Motor Actions

Elana R Goldenkoff et al. J Neurosci. .

Abstract

Voluntary movement control depends on plasticity in several interconnected brain regions, including the cerebellum (CB), primary motor cortex (M1), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC). It is thought that one role of the CB is to regulate communication between PPC and M1, but causal evidence for this regulatory role in humans remains lacking. Here, we evaluated how transiently altering activity in CB via intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) affects PPC-M1 connectivity and plasticity by assessing the effectiveness of subsequent Hebbian-like cortical paired associative stimulation (cPAS) to PPC and M1. Using a within-subject design, we administered four different single-session stimulation conditions to the CB and parietal-motor pathway of the motor network and measured the aftereffects on plasticity (both sexes). We administered iTBS to the right CB or right visual cortex, followed by cPAS of a parietal-motor circuit in the left hemisphere. In a subset of participants, we performed two additional control conditions to assess the effect of CB iTBS alone and Hebbian-like cPAS of the PPC-M1 circuit alone. We evaluated motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation as a measure of motor cortical excitability before and after each plasticity induction protocol. Cerebellar iTBS reduced cPAS-induced plasticity in the parietal-motor circuit, as evidenced by a decrease in MEPs. These responses were selective, as no decreases in excitability were observed during the control experiments. These findings suggest that CB activity can modify distal neural activity in a network-connected parietal-motor circuit through heterosynaptic metaplasticity.

Keywords: TMS; action; excitability; motor cortex; parietal cortex; plasticity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bastian AJ (2006) Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16:645–649. 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bear MF (1995) Mechanism for a sliding synaptic modification threshold. Neuron 15:1–4. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90056-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Betancourt MJ, Girolami M (2013) Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for hierarchical models. arXiv.
    1. Betancourt M, Girolami M (2015) Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for hierarchical models. In: Current trends in Bayesian methodology with applications (Upadhyay SK, Singh U, Dey DK, Loganathan A, eds), Ed 1, pp 79–100. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
    1. Beynel L, Powers JP, Appelbaum LG (2020) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on resting-state connectivity: a systematic review. Neuroimage 211:116596. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116596 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources