Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;91(8):907-922.
doi: 10.2166/wst.2025.049. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

Use of a numerical model to evaluate SO2 absorption efficiency by sodium sulfite in packed and spray columns

Rodolphe Vautherin  1   2 , Hélène Métivier  1 , Anne Reguer  2 , Hassen Benbelkacem  3
Affiliations

Use of a numerical model to evaluate SO2 absorption efficiency by sodium sulfite in packed and spray columns

Rodolphe Vautherin et al. Water Sci Technol. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Numerical modeling has been used extensively to simulate gas-liquid transfer of sulfur dioxide, assessing how operational parameters affect absorption efficiency in packed or spray columns. Despite individual studies on these contactors, comparative analyses on the same flue gas have been rare. This study uses a numerical model for both packed and spray columns to examine how parameters influence SO2 absorption by sodium sulfite, describing packed and spray columns, is used to investigate the influence of operational parameters on SO2 absorption by sodium sulfite. The model's predictions are validated against experimental data from an industrial pilot plant. Across varying conditions (L/G ratio, temperature, initial SO2 content or initial S(IV) concentration), the packed column achieves higher absorption efficiencies compared to the spray column, with lower assumed energy costs due to a reduced L/G ratio. Temperature proves to be a significant factor, decreasing absorption efficiency by approximately 40% between 40 and 70 °C. SO2 absorption efficiency declines with increasing concentrations of bisulfite and sulfite ions in the absorption solution, dropping to 50% at an S(IV) concentration of 2 kmol m-3 in the liquid phase. Considering the objective of producing a concentrated bisulfite solution and a clean gas, a two-column system is recommended: one for bisulfite solution concentration at acidic pH and the other for gas purification enhancement at basic pH.

Keywords: SO2 absorption; flue gas desulfurization; modeling; packed column; spray column; sulfur recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there is no conflict.

References

    1. Bandyopadhyay A. & Biswas M. N. (2007) Modeling of SO2 scrubbing in spray towers, Sci. Total Environ., 333 (1–3), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.024.
    1. Bravo R. V., Camacho R. F., Moya V. M. & Garcia L. A. I. (2002) Desulphurization of SO2-N2 mixtures by limestone slurries, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57, 2047–2058. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00095-7.
    1. Buzek J. & Jaschik M. (1995) Gas-liquid equilibria in the system SO2-aqueous solution of NaHSO3/Na2SO3/Na2SO4, Chem. Eng. Sci., 50 (19), 3067–3075. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00144-T.
    1. Chen X., Sun P., Cui L., Xu W. & Dong Y. (2022) Limestone-based dual-loop wet flue gas desulfurization under oxygen-enriched combustion, Fuel, 322, 124161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124161.
    1. Ebrahimi S., Picioreanu C., Kleerebezem R., Heijnen J. J. & Van Loosdrecht M. C. M. (2003) Rate-based modelling of SO2 absorption into aqueous NaHCO3/Na2CO3 solutions accompanied by the desorption of CO2, Chem. Eng. Sci., 58, 3589–3600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00231-8.

LinkOut - more resources