Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up
- PMID: 4030826
Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up
Abstract
From January 1979 to February 1982, 143 patients (seventy-nine women and sixty-four men) with 146 uninfected cemented total hip arthroplasties had revision cemented hip arthroplasty at The Hospital for Special Surgery for what was considered to be mechanical failure. The average age of the patients at primary arthroplasty was 56.1 years and at revision, 62.1 years. Loosening of the femoral component before revision correlated with varus positioning in 50 per cent of the hips, inadequate cement in 34 per cent, and a relatively young age in 16 per cent. The average age of the patients (fifteen hips) with a loose femoral component that had been placed in a neutral or valgus position with good cementing technique was 48.2 years at the time of primary arthroplasty. Loosening of the acetabular component was attributed to high placement of the cup in 41 per cent, inadequate bone in 18 per cent, a vertical orientation of the opening of the cup in 7 per cent, and poor cementing technique in 3 per cent. Complications associated with revision included perforation of the femoral cortex in 13 per cent, postoperative deep infection in 3.4 per cent, postoperative dislocation in 8.2 per cent, trochanteric complications in 6.2 per cent, and sciatic palsy in 0.7 per cent. Of the 139 hips that were followed for an average of 3.6 years (range, two to five years) after revision, the results were excellent in 59 per cent, good in 7 per cent, fair in 16 per cent, and poor in 18 per cent. After revision of the 139 hips, 29 per cent showed progressive radiolucencies; 18 per cent, femoral subsidence; and 9 per cent, acetabular migration. Definite mechanical failure after revision was identified in 15.8 per cent of the hips. These failures were due to loosening in 12.2 per cent of the hips, femoral fracture in 2.2 per cent, and disabling dislocation in 1.4 per cent. At the time of follow-up, twelve hips (8.6 per cent) had been revised a second time: six (4.3 per cent) for loosening of one or both components, three (2.2 per cent) for femoral fracture, and three (2.2 per cent) for infection. Mechanical failure and progressive radiolucencies were associated with poor quality of bone (p less than 0.001) and inadequate anatomical reconstruction (p less than 0.03).
Similar articles
-
Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jan;79(1):53-64. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997. PMID: 9010186
-
Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jul;78(7):982-94. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199607000-00002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996. PMID: 8698734
-
The long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients who have congenital dislocation, degenerative osteoarthrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Nov;79(11):1599-617. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199711000-00001. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997. PMID: 9384419
-
From the RSNA refresher courses. Total hip arthroplasty: radiographic evaluation.Radiographics. 1996 May;16(3):645-60. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.16.3.8897629. Radiographics. 1996. PMID: 8897629 Review.
-
Two stage one component revision in infected total hip replacements - two case reports and literature review.Hip Int. 2009 Jul-Sep;19(3):292-8. doi: 10.1177/112070000901900319. Hip Int. 2009. PMID: 19876888 Review.
Cited by
-
[Minimally invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty].Orthopade. 2012 May;41(5):382-9. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1893-4. Orthopade. 2012. PMID: 22581148 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patient with Aplastic Anemia.Hip Pelvis. 2016 Mar;28(1):24-8. doi: 10.5371/hp.2016.28.1.24. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Hip Pelvis. 2016. PMID: 27536640 Free PMC article.
-
Technical Note for Transfemoral Implantation of Tapered Revision Stems. The Advantage to Stay Short.Arthroplast Today. 2021 Apr 24;9:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.03.015. eCollection 2021 Jun. Arthroplast Today. 2021. PMID: 33997203 Free PMC article.
-
The mechanical effects of femoral shaft perforation at total hip replacement.Int Orthop. 1989;13(1):65-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00266726. Int Orthop. 1989. PMID: 2722318
-
Femoral shaft perforation at arthroplasty: to treat or not to treat.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990;109(4):217-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00453144. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990. PMID: 2383451
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources