Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;11(6):515-531.
doi: 10.1177/23294965241254071. Epub 2024 May 21.

Embodied Injustice: Comparing Lesbian, Bisexual, and Queer and Heterosexual Women's Accounts of Unwanted Sex

Jessie V Ford  1 , Aarushi Shah  1 , Gloria Fortuna  1 , Jennifer S Hirsch  1
Affiliations

Embodied Injustice: Comparing Lesbian, Bisexual, and Queer and Heterosexual Women's Accounts of Unwanted Sex

Jessie V Ford et al. Soc Curr. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Lesbian, bisexual, and queer (LBQ) women experience disproportionately high rates of unwanted sex, including sexual assault. The literature has noted LBQ women's elevated risk for sexual victimization compared to heterosexual women, but little research has compared LBQ women's processing of sexual violations to those of heterosexual women. To address this gap, this article examines accounts of unwanted sex among 20 LBQ and 38 heterosexual college women (57 cisgender; 1 transwoman). We use both studies of embodiment and queer theory to understand socially patterned differences between LBQ and heterosexual women's accounts of unwanted sex. Our findings indicate that heterosexual women's multiple experiences with men (violent and not) often lead to explanations of sexual violations focused on men's individual characteristics, for example, certain men are better/worse than others. In contrast, LBQ women's experiences with women/non-binary partners produce a broader critique of heterosexuality. We find suggestive evidence that this difference helps LBQ women move away from self-blame toward a position of naming injustice.

Keywords: sex and gender; sexualities; unwanted sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Allison Rachel and Risman Barbara J. 2013. “A double standard for “Hooking Up”: How far have we come toward gender equality?” Social Science Research 42(5):1191–1206. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong Elizabeth and Budnick Jamie. 2015. “Sexual Assault on Campus. Contemporary Families: Brief Report. Concil on Contemporary Families.”
    1. Armstrong Elizabeth A, Paula England, and Fogarty Alison CK. 2012. “Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships.” American Sociological Review 77(3):435–462.
    1. Armstrong Elizabeth A, Hamilton Laura, and Sweeney Brian. 2006. “Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape.” Social Problems 53(4):483–499.
    1. Bartky S 1988. “Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power.” in Feminism & Foucault: Reflections on resistance, edited by Diamond I and Quinby L. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

LinkOut - more resources