Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 Apr 30;7(3):dlaf067.
doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf067. eCollection 2025 Jun.

AMRrounds: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the intensive care unit-when resistance meets severity

Affiliations
Case Reports

AMRrounds: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the intensive care unit-when resistance meets severity

Davide Mangioni et al. JAC Antimicrob Resist. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Chest X-ray performed at hospital admission (a) (no pathological findings) and 7 days later at the onset of respiratory failure and septic shock (b), which shows extensive lung consolidations in the lower right lobe and in the upper and lower left lobes.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolates corresponding to the clinical case. aRelevant resistome from WGS analysis for the ST369 isolate: blaOXA-66 (up-regulated by upstream insertion of ISAba1), blaADC-30 (up-regulated by upstream insertion of ISAba1), blaOXA-23, ftsIN392T, ΔpirA, parCS84L, gyrAS81L. Resistome analysis was carried out using the ResFinder (https://github.com/cadms/resfinder), NCBI AMRFinderPlus (https://github.com/ncbi/amr) and Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) (https://card.mcmaster.ca/) platforms. The presence of IS elements in the 500 bp region upstream of the resistance genes was determined using the ISfinder tool (https://www-is.biotoul.fr/). Variant calling was performed using snippy (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) using CP091345 as reference. Only resistance mechanisms deemed to be potentially relevant to the observed resistance phenotypes are indicated. bRelevant resistome from WGS analysis: blaOXA-66, blaADC-73 (up-regulated by upstream insertion of ISAba1), blaOXA-23, blaTEM-1, ftsIA515V, armA, parCS84L, gyrAS81L. Resistome analysis was carried out as described in footnote a. Only resistance mechanisms deemed to be potentially relevant to the observed resistance phenotypes are indicated. cDetermined by broth microdilution, using iron-depleted medium for cefiderocol testing (EUCAST 15.0, 2025). dAccording to CLSI standard M100, 35th Edition (2025). eAccording to EUCAST 15.0 clinical breakpoints (2025). fAccording to EUCAST 15.0 clinical breakpoints (2025), the MIC value indicates the absence of phenotypically detectable resistance mechanisms. In this case, EUCAST warns against using this agent as monotherapy due to lack of clinical evidence, while the agent could be used in combination with other effective measures. gAccording to EUCAST guidance on ‘When there are no breakpoints in breakpoint tables?’ (September 2024), when there is a ‘dash’ instead of numerical values the microbe can be reported as resistant without further testing. hAccording to EUCAST 15.0 clinical breakpoints (2025), the in vitro activity of cefiderocol for Acinetobacter spp. is comparable to the activity of the agent for Enterobacterales and there are also animal data to suggest efficacy. However, there are insufficient clinical data to determine a clinical breakpoint. Isolates with MIC values of ≤0.5 mg/L are mostly devoid of resistance mechanisms. Isolates with MICs of 1–2 mg/L have acquired resistance mechanisms that may result in impaired clinical response. Isolates with MIC values of >2 mg/L will likely be resistant. iAccording to EUCAST guidance on ‘When there are no breakpoints in breakpoint tables?’ (September 2024), for the treatment of Gram-negative aerobic bacteria the clinical use of ampicillin/sulbactam should be discouraged when MIC values are higher than 8 mg/L.

References

    1. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators . Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2022; 399: 629–55. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shields RK, Paterson DL, Tamma PD. Navigating available treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex infections. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76: S179–93. 10.1093/cid/ciad094 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bassetti M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y et al. Efficacy and safety of cefiderocol or best available therapy for the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CREDIBLE-CR): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, pathogen-focused, descriptive, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2021; 21: 226–40. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30796-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaye KS, Shorr AF, Wunderink RG et al. Efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin for the treatment of patients with serious infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex: a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial (ATTACK). Lancet Infect Dis 2023; 23: 1072–84. 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00184-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Donnell J, Tanudra A, Chen A et al. In vitro pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of the β-lactamase inhibitor, durlobactam, in combination with sulbactam against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2024; 68: e0031223. 10.1128/aac.00312-23 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types