Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 14;15(8):1000.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15081000.

Duodenal Biopsies for Coeliac Disease: Does Size Matter?

Affiliations

Duodenal Biopsies for Coeliac Disease: Does Size Matter?

Mohamed G Shiha et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Most adult patients require endoscopy and duodenal biopsies to diagnose coeliac disease. However, individuals who are unwilling or unable to undergo conventional endoscopy are left without diagnostic options or a formal diagnosis. We aimed to determine whether the small-sized biopsy forceps used during the more tolerable transnasal endoscopy (TNE) can provide adequate duodenal biopsy specimens for diagnosing coeliac disease. Methods: We prospectively recruited adult patients (≥18 years) with suspected coeliac disease between May and July 2024. All patients underwent peroral endoscopy, with four biopsies taken from the second part of the duodenum (D2) and one from the duodenal bulb (D1) using standard 2.8 mm biopsy forceps. The biopsy protocol was then repeated using smaller 2 mm biopsy forceps. Expert pathologists evaluated all samples for size, quality, and Marsh classification. Results: Ten patients (median age 45 years, 50% female) were included in this study, of whom seven (70%) were diagnosed with coeliac disease. In total, 100 duodenal biopsy specimens were collected and analysed (50 using standard biopsy forceps and 50 using smaller biopsy forceps). The size of D2 biopsies was significantly larger when using standard biopsy forceps compared with smaller forceps (4.5 mm vs. 3 mm, p = 0.001). Similarly, biopsies from D1 were also larger with standard forceps (3 mm vs. 2 mm, p = 0.002). Smaller forceps provided sufficient material for accurate classification in all cases, and the agreement between biopsies obtained using both forceps in D2 and D1 was 100% (k = 1.0). Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that small-sized biopsy forceps, used during TNE, can provide adequate tissue for histopathological diagnosis in patients with suspected coeliac disease. These findings pave the way for considering TNE as a more tolerable alternative to conventional endoscopy in diagnosing coeliac disease.

Keywords: biopsy; coeliac disease; diagnosis; glutens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of this manuscript; or in the decision to publish these results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of duodenal biopsies obtained using standard and small forceps. (A) Standard duodenal biopsy showing normal duodenal mucosa; the biopsy was 2.8 mm in maximum dimension, as shown by the blue line. (B) Small size duodenal biopsy from the same patient showing normal duodenal mucosa; the biopsy was 2.5 mm in maximum dimension, as shown by the blue line.

References

    1. Lebwohl B., Sanders D.S., Green P.H.R. Coeliac Disease. Lancet. 2018;391:70–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31796-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh P., Arora A., Strand T.A., Leffler D.A., Catassi C., Green P.H., Kelly C.P., Ahuja V., Makharia G.K. Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018;16:823–836.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. King J.A., Jeong J., Underwood F.E., Quan J., Panaccione N., Windsor J.W., Coward S., Debruyn J., Ronksley P.E., Shaheen A.A., et al. Incidence of Celiac Disease Is Increasing over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020;115:507–525. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000523. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson R.P. Review Article: Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease: A Perspective on Current and Future Approaches. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022;56:S18–S37. doi: 10.1111/apt.16840. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fjorback S.S.O., Eskildsen F.R., Kårhus L.L., Linneberg A., Lund A.F., Schiøtz M.L., Grew J. ‘It Was Hell on Earth’: Perspectives of People Living with Celiac Disease on Diagnostic Delay. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2024;37:1486–1495. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13370. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources