Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;31(13):2777-2792.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3582.

Presurgical Ablative Radiation Is Associated with Local Control and Immune Response in Pancreatic Cancer

Peter Q Leung  1 , Eslam A Elghonaimy  1 , Ahmed M Elamir  1 , Megan Wachsmann  2 , Song Zhang  3 , Neha Barrows  1 , Hollis Notgrass  2 , Ethan Johnson  4 , Cheryl M Lewis  4 , Rachel von Ebers  1 , Cassandra Hamilton  1 , Samy Castillo-Flores  5 , Ricardo E Nunez-Rocha  5 , Grace Josephson  1 , Zhikai Chi  2 , Salwan Al Mutar  6 , Patricio M Polanco  5 , Nina N Sanford  1 , Syed M Ali Kazmi  6 , Matthew R Porembka  5 , David Hsiehchen  6 , Adam C Yopp  5 , John C Mansour  5 , Muhammad S Beg  6 , Herbert J Zeh 3rd  5 , Todd A Aguilera  1
Affiliations

Presurgical Ablative Radiation Is Associated with Local Control and Immune Response in Pancreatic Cancer

Peter Q Leung et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare outcomes and molecular characteristics of patients who had surgery after neoadjuvant (NA) chemotherapy, with and without stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR), for pancreatic cancer. Insight could clarify the benefits of SAbR and provide molecular guidance for future therapeutic regimens.

Experimental design: This single-institution, tertiary care academic center cohort study included all patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2012 and 2023 treated with NA chemotherapy, with or without SAbR. We compared therapeutic responses, performed patient matching, and conducted Cox modeling to identify differences between groups. We assessed molecular response using RNA sequencing to identify SAbR-induced biologic differences.

Results: Among 133 patients receiving chemotherapy and 48 receiving chemotherapy + SAbR, RNA sequencing was available for 29 and 14 patients, respectively. Despite more advanced baseline disease, the SAbR group showed better posttreatment pathology and similar overall survival [HR = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-1.60, P = 0.9]. Patient matching indicated that SAbR improved locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.07-0.88, P = 0.009). Arterial involvement raised local failure risk with chemotherapy alone (HR = 3.37, 95% CI, 1.74-6.54, P < 0.001), which was significantly reduced with SAbR (HR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.68; P = 0.005). Gene set enrichment analysis showed immune activation, with CD8 and NK/NKT cell signatures associated with local control and Treg signatures associated with worse control.

Conclusions: NA SAbR is associated with improved pathologic outcomes, enhanced local control, and maintained survival while inducing a distinct immune response. Well-powered studies are needed to clarify its clinical benefits.

PubMed Disclaimer