The Impact of Modifiable Parenting Factors on the Screen Use of Children Five Years or Younger: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 40310597
- PMCID: PMC12162779
- DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00523-9
The Impact of Modifiable Parenting Factors on the Screen Use of Children Five Years or Younger: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Most children under age 5 exceed recommended screen time guidelines, with lifelong implications for children's psychosocial, cognitive, socio-emotional, and physiological outcomes. Socio-ecological models point towards the important contribution of parental knowledge, modelling, practices, self-efficacy and style on child screen use. This study aimed to determine the extent to which these parenting factors influence child screen use, as well as the moderating role of screen media type (i.e. fixed vs. portable) on the relationship between parenting factors and child screen use. A systematic literature search for peer-reviewed studies published in English from 1982 to 2023 was conducted and yielded 87 eligible studies. Greater parental modelling, mealtime viewing, and the use of screens as a babysitting, mood regulation or reinforcement tool, were associated with higher child screen use. Contrastingly, higher levels of parental self-efficacy, and the implementation of screen use rules were associated with lower child screen use. Interventions targeting these parenting factors pose as a promising avenue to reduce child screen use. An authoritative parenting style was associated with lower child screen use, while authoritarian and permissive styles were associated with higher child screen use. The evidence for parental knowledge and co-viewing and, a neglectful parenting style was inconsistent or inconclusive. Finally, no observable trends or patterns in the data regarding the role of screen media type emerged. Future research should look to address issues in the measurement of child screen use to ensure comprehensive and objective assessments.
Keywords: Parenting; Portable media; Pre-schoolers; Screen use; Self-efficacy.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The Parenting and Family Support Centre is partly funded by royalties stemming from published resources of the Triple P—Positive Parenting Program, which is developed and owned by The University of Queensland (UQ). Royalties are also distributed to the Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences at UQ and contributory authors of published Triple P resources. Triple P International (TPI) Pty Ltd is a private company licenced by UQ, to publish and disseminate Triple P worldwide. The authors of this report have no share or ownership of TPI. A/Prof Morawska receives royalties from TPI. TPI had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, or writing of this report. A/Prof Morawska is an employee at UQ, Olifa Asmara is a PhD student at UQ. Ethical Approval: Not applicable.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Parental control, nurturance, self-efficacy, and screen viewing among 5- to 6-year-old children: a cross-sectional mediation analysis to inform potential behavior change strategies.Child Obes. 2015 Apr;11(2):139-47. doi: 10.1089/chi.2014.0110. Epub 2015 Jan 13. Child Obes. 2015. PMID: 25584518 Free PMC article.
-
Parenting styles, food-related parenting practices, and children's healthy eating: A mediation analysis to examine relationships between parenting and child diet.Appetite. 2018 Sep 1;128:205-213. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jun 18. Appetite. 2018. PMID: 29920321 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-sectional associations between maternal parenting styles, physical activity and screen sedentary time in children.BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4784-8. BMC Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28962600 Free PMC article.
-
Parenting styles, feeding styles, and their influence on child obesogenic behaviors and body weight. A review.Appetite. 2013 Dec;71:232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Aug 31. Appetite. 2013. PMID: 24001395 Review.
-
Nonresponsive Parenting Feeding Styles and Practices and Risk of Overweight and Obesity among Chinese Children Living Outside Mainland China: An Integrative Review of the Literature.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4090. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054090. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36901101 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abbott, G., Hnatiuk, J., Timperio, A., Salmon, J., Best, K., & Hesketh, K. D. (2016). Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between parents’ and preschoolers’ physical activity and television viewing: The HAPPY study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health,13(3), 269–274. 10.1123/jpah.2015-0136 - PubMed
-
- Akbayin, M., Mulliez, A., Fortin, F., Vicard Olagne, M., Laporte, C., & Vorilhon, P. (2023). Screen exposure time of children under 6 years old: A French cross-sectional survey in general practices in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region. BMC Primary Care,24(1), 58–58. 10.1186/s12875-023-02009-5 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ali, R. A., & Almaaytah, M. M. D. (2022). Correlates of parental knowledge about smartphone exposure among young children. Pediatrics International,64(1), e15246. 10.1111/ped.15246 - PubMed
-
- Andrews, K. R., Silk, K. S., & Eneli, I. U. (2010). Parents as health promoters: A theory of planned behavior perspective on the prevention of childhood obesity. Journal of Health Communication,15(1), 95–107. 10.1080/10810730903460567 - PubMed
-
- Asplund, K. M., Kair, L. R., Arain, Y. H., Cervantes, M., Oreskovic, N. M., & Zuckerman, K. E. (2015). Early childhood screen time and parental attitudes toward child television viewing in a low-income Latino population attending the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. Childhood Obesity,11(5), 590–599. 10.1089/chi.2015.0001 - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical