Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;156(2):385-393.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.03.032. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

Fine resolution of the N-terminal IgE-binding epitope of Ara h 2: Discovery of variants with enhanced IgE binding

Affiliations

Fine resolution of the N-terminal IgE-binding epitope of Ara h 2: Discovery of variants with enhanced IgE binding

Joshua S Bernstein et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: IgE binding to linear peptides from the N-terminal region of Ara h 2 (epitope 1) is associated with the achievement of sustained unresponsiveness in young children receiving oral immunotherapy and may be important for cross-reactivity between peanuts and tree nuts. This region is also part of the binding site for neutralizing IgG monoclonal antibodies associated with sustained unresponsiveness following oral immunotherapy.

Objective: We sought to perform alanine scanning of this epitope to determine the importance of individual amino acids and then amino acid scanning to screen for sequences with enhanced binding of IgE.

Methods: A streptavidin IgE ELISA with biotinylated peptides was used to measure the binding of IgE to full-length and truncated peptides to identify a core sequence (DRRCQSQLERAN, amino acids 30-41 in the Ara h 2 sequence). Peptide microarrays were used to screen multiple peptides and quantitate binding of IgE. Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett multiple comparison test.

Results: IgE binding was greatly reduced when alanine was substituted for arginine at positions 31, 32, and 39 (R31, P < .001; R32, P < .01; R39, P < .001); glutamine at positions 34 and 36 (Q34, P < .01; Q36, P < .001); and glutamate at position 38 (E38, P < .01). Substitution of aspartate with asparagine at position D30 in conjunction with substitution of asparagine at position N41 with either leucine or lysine gave enhanced binding (P < .0001). Molecular modeling of these data suggests a conformational basis for recognition by polyclonal IgE.

Conclusions: IgE binding assays using pooled and individual sera demonstrated the importance of amino acids throughout the sequence of epitope 1 for immune recognition. The results of alanine scanning indicated residues that could be changed as part of a larger strategy to generate hypoallergenic forms of Ara h 2, whereas sequence variants with enhanced binding were identified that may be useful for improving diagnostics.

Keywords: 2S albumins; Ara h 2; IgE; epitope; food allergy; mimotope; peanuts; peptides.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement This work was supported by R21AI135397 (to S.C.D.), RO1AI165866 (to S.C.D.), and R21AI109090 (W.B.). Contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official National Institutes of Health views. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: S. C. Dreskin, W. Braun, X. Chen, and C. H. Schein have received grant support from the National Institutes of Health. S. C. Dreskin reports grant support from Genentech, Inc, and serves on an advisory board and/or is a consultant for Ukko, Inc. M. D. Kulis receives grant support from the US Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health and has received consultancy fees from Ukko, Inc. E. H. Kim reports advisory board membership with ALK, DBV Technologies, Kenota Health, and Ukko, Inc; consultancy with Aimmune Therapeutics, AllerGenis, Belhaven Biopharma, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Nutricia; and receives grant support to his institution from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Food Allergy Research & Education, and the Wallace Research Foundation. A provisional patent application regarding these novel sequences has been filed (S. C. Dreskin and C. H. Schein). The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
IgE binding to epitope 1 and alanine scanned peptides of epitope 1. IgE microarray assays of alanine scanned peptides were performed as described in the Methods section. Background (100–300 density units) with empty spots was subtracted. Data from 4 individual assays were pooled. Data were normalized so that the signal with native sequence was set to 100%. Substitution of 5 of the 12 amino acids (R31, R32, Q34, E37, R38) individually with alanine showed significantly reduced binding of polyclonal IgE. The data reported as density units are shown in Fig E2. ***P < .001, **** P < .0001.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Residues in the N-terminal epitope 1 of Ara h 2 with reduced IgE binding in the alanine scan have substantial SASAs in the protein. IgE microarray assays were performed as described in the Methods section. (A) Residues that, when changed to A, have significantly reduced IgE binding are shown in red on this region of the Ara h 2 structure. (B) SASAs were calculated by the GetArea program, which measures quantitatively the area of a peptide that is accessible by a water molecule. The differences in SASAs for the residues of epitope 1 in the isolated peptide (SASA Peptide) and in the folded 3D structure of Ara h 2 (SASA Fold) are shown. The difference between these values (SASA Diff) shows that these critical residues are surface exposed in both forms, indicating that IgE recognition of the epitope 1 peptides reflects the structure of Ara h 2.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
IgE binding to novel variants of epitope 1. IgE microarray assays of novel variants of epitope 1 were performed with the serum pool in 3 independent assays as described in the Methods section. Background (100–300 density units) with empty spots was subtracted. Data were then normalized so that the signal with the native sequence was set to 100%. Data are shown as percent of the signal seen with the native sequence. The data reported as density units are shown in Fig E5. ***P < .001, ****P < .0001.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Dose response of IgE binding to epitope 1, D30N/N41K, epitope 1, D30N/41F and epitope 1, D30N/N41L, compared with the native sequence. Three independent IgE microarray assays were performed as described in the Methods section with varying dilutions of the serum pool to yield the Ara h 2–specific IgE concentrations noted. Circles indicate native sequence; triangles indicate epitope 1, D30N/N41K; upside-down triangles indicate epitope 1, D30N/N41F; and squares indicate epitope 1, D30N/N41L. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, ****P < .0001.
FIG 5.
FIG 5.
Proposed structural changes in epitope 1, D30N/N41K, and epitope 1, D30N/N41L, peptides with higher affinity for IgE, indicates that the altered residues have similar high surface exposure. The critical sidechains of epitope 1 for IgE binding are illustrated in red on the 3D model of Ara h 2 (A) and orange for epitope 1, D30N/N41K (B), and epitope 1, D30N/N41L (C). The amino acid changes at positions 1 and 12 in the variants are colored red.

References

    1. Sicherer SH, Warren CM, Dant C, Gupta RS, Nadeau KC. Food allergy from infancy through adulthood. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:1854–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peters RL, Allen KJ, Dharmage SC, Koplin JJ, Dang T, Tilbrook KP, et al. Natural history of peanut allergy and predictors of resolution in the first 4 years of life: a population-based assessment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;135:1257–66.e1–2. - PubMed
    1. Jones SM, Burks AW. Food allergy. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1168–76. - PubMed
    1. Fisher HR, Du Toit G, Bahnson HT, Lack G. The challenges of preventing food allergy: lessons learned from LEAP and EAT. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018;121:313–9. - PubMed
    1. Vickery BP, Ebisawa M, Shreffler WG, Wood RA. Current and future treatment of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019;7:357–65. - PubMed

MeSH terms