Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 1.
doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16345. Online ahead of print.

Mobility device use in children with cerebral palsy

Elizabeth Maus  1 , Ben Reader  1   2 , Jill C Heathcock  1
Affiliations

Mobility device use in children with cerebral palsy

Elizabeth Maus et al. Dev Med Child Neurol. .

Abstract

Aims: To quantify the number and types of mobility devices used by children with cerebral palsy (CP) and explore the relationships between Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS) level, age, insurance, income, and number and types of devices.

Method: This was a secondary analysis of a cohort from a larger randomized controlled trial. Data from 89 children with CP (56.2% male and 43.8% female; mean = 4 years 11 months; SD = 2 years 0 months; range 2 years 0 months-8 years 10 months) were collected from electronic medical records, parent-completed medical history questionnaires, and the Hollingshead Four-Factor Index. The analysis included quasi-Poisson and logistical regressions.

Results: Most children had Medicaid insurance (83.2%). All income and GMFCS levels were represented. The most common mobility devices were lower-extremity orthoses (75.3%). The number of devices used increased by 8.2% for each 1-year increase in age. Children classified in GMFCS level V used 5.1, 2.9, and 1.6 times more mobility devices than children classified in GMFCS levels I, II, and III respectively. GMFCS level also predicted the use of wheelchairs, bath chairs, and standers. Income and insurance were not significant.

Interpretation: Children used more devices as age and GMFCS level increased. Device access is an important public health initiative.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. McIntyre S, Goldsmith S, Webb A, Ehlinger V, Julsen Hollung S, McConnell K, et al. Global prevalence of cerebral palsy: A systematic analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Aug 11;64(12):1494–506.
    1. Dar H, Stewart K, McIntyre S, Paget S. Multiple motor disorders in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Mar 1;66(3):317–25.
    1. Rosenbaum PL, Palisano RJ, Bartlett DJ, Galuppi BE, Russell DJ. Development of the Gross Motor Function Classification System for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Apr;50(4):249–53.
    1. Gudjonsdottir B, Gudmundsdottir SB. Mobility devices for children with physical disabilities: use, satisfaction and impact on participation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Aug;18(6):722–9.
    1. Aboutorabi A, Arazpour M, Ahmadi Bani M, Saeedi H, Head JS. Efficacy of ankle foot orthoses types on walking in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Nov;60(6):393–402.

LinkOut - more resources