Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature
- PMID: 40313360
- PMCID: PMC12043522
- DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1533813
Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature
Abstract
Introduction: Following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Louisiana enacted a "trigger law" banning nearly all abortions. Attempts to reform existing restrictive legislation so as to allow for abortions under exceptions have been unsuccessful to date. This study aims to describe how abortion discourse is framed in public testimony around House Bill 346 in the 2023 Louisiana legislative session, which attempted to pass an abortion exception for pregnancy in the case of rape or incest.
Methods: We conducted a conventional qualitative content analysis utilizing a rhetorical lens, using testimony transcripts from the May 10, 2023, Louisiana Administration of Criminal Justice Committee hearing. An iterative coding approach allowed us to categorize salient themes, language patterns, speaker characteristics, emotional tones, and rhetorical strategies. Demographic characteristics were ascribed to speakers based on perceived gender and race when not self-identified.
Results: Testimony analysis revealed four primary themes: (1) conflicting representations of abortion, (2) religion's role in shaping discourse, (3) humanization of fetuses vs. pregnant individuals, and (4) debate over available resources for survivors and children. Abortion is represented as being traumatic, adding to the trauma caused by sexual violence, while representing childbearing as healing from trauma. Being conceived as a result of sexual violence is used as an identity marker worthy of protection. Religious rhetoric permeates testimony both in support and in opposition to abortion exceptions, making a "pro-life" stance the starting point for debate. Lastly, we find evidence of dehumanization of survivors' and others' experience.
Conclusions: The testimonies around HB346 expose deeply polarized discourse that reflects moral, religious, and ethical conflicts, as well as mismatched conversations that are unlikely to persuade opposing sides. Addressing these dissonant narratives requires nuanced advocacy strategies and resources to support effective testimony.
Keywords: abortion; discourse; legislation; reproductive health; sexual violence.
© 2025 Silva, Stolow, Burdick and Mercieca.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer DB declared a past co-authorship with the author MS to the handling editor.
References
-
- Center for Reproductive Rights. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Available at: https://reproductiverights.org/scotus-mississippi-abortion-ban/ (Accessed February 17, 2022).
-
- Fuentes L. Inequity in US Abortion Rights and Access: The End of Roe is Deepening Existing Divides. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; (2023). Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/01/inequity-us-abortion-rights-and-acces... (Accessed February 17, 2023).
-
- Center for Reproductive Rights. Abortion Laws by State—Louisiana. Available at: https://reproductiverights.org/maps/state/louisiana/ (Accessed May 30, 2024).
-
- Dickman SL, White K, Himmelstein DU, Lupez E, Schrier E, Woolhandler S. Rape-related pregnancies in the 14 US states with total abortion bans. JAMA Intern Med. (2024) 184(3):330–2. Available at: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2814274 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Henderson M, Slocum J. The Louisiana Survey. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University; (2023). Available at: https://www.lsu.edu/manship/research/centers-labs/rcmpa/research/la_surv... (Accessed February 1, 2024).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
