Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes at Robot-Assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy
- PMID: 40314906
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-17398-3
Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes at Robot-Assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this work is to quantify the magnitude of improvement in in-hospital outcomes between historical and contemporary robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus historical and contemporary open PN (OPN).
Methods: Within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2010-2019), we identified patients who underwent RPN and OPN. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit.
Results: Historical (2010-2014) versus contemporary (2015-2019) proportions were 39% (n = 5,897) versus 61% (n = 9168) for RPN and 59% (n = 7289) versus 41% (n = 5,120) for OPN. Relative to historical, contemporary RPN patients exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 6 of 12 categories that ranged from-76% for intraoperative complications to-24% for length of stay (LOS) ≥ 75th percentile. Relative to historical, contemporary OPN patients also exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 7 of 12 categories that ranged from-76% for intraoperative complications to-23% for LOS ≥ 75th percentile. When historical RPN was compared with historical OPN, RPN in-hospital outcomes were better in 10 of 12 comparisons that ranged from-75% for LOS ≥ 75th percentile to-28% for perioperative bleeding. Similarly, when contemporary RPN was compared with contemporary OPN, RPN outcomes were better in 8 of 12 comparisons that ranged from-75% for LOS ≥ 75th percentile to-27% for postoperative complications.
Conclusion: The magnitude of improvement in in-hospital outcomes was more pronounced for contemporary versus historical OPN (seven improved categories) than for contemporary versus historical RPN (six improved categories). However, contemporary RPN outperformed contemporary OPN patients in eight in-hospital outcome categories.
Keywords: Complications; NIS; RCC; Surgery.
© 2025. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest Ethical Approval: All analyses and their reporting followed the NIS reporting guidelines. Owing to the anonymously coded design of the NIS database, study-specific Institutional Review Board ethics approval was not required.
References
-
- EAU Guidelines on RCC - DISEASE MANAGEMENT - Uroweb. Uroweb - European Association of Urology n.d. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/renal-cell-carcinoma/chapter/disease-manag... (accessed September 11, 2022).
-
- Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, Alva A, Baine M, Beckermann K, et al. Kidney ccancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Comp Cancer Netw. 2022;20:71–90. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0001 . - DOI
-
- Zeuschner P, Vollmer SG, Linxweiler J, Wagenpfeil G, Wagenpfeil S, Saar M, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a retrospective cohort study across 10 years. Surg Oncol. 2021;38:101607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101607 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bravi CA, Rosiello G, Mazzone E, Minervini A, Mari A, Di Maida F, et al. The IRON study: investigation of robot-assisted versus open nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023;49:71–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.017 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Hoeh B, Wenzel M, Eckart O, Fleisgarten F, Garcia CC, Köllermann J, et al. Comparison of peri- and intraoperative outcomes of open vs robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2023;21:189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03061-2 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
