Novel 3D printed resin crown versus prefabricated zirconia crown for restoring pulpotomized primary molars: in vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and marginal gap
- PMID: 40314911
- DOI: 10.1007/s40368-025-01038-1
Novel 3D printed resin crown versus prefabricated zirconia crown for restoring pulpotomized primary molars: in vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and marginal gap
Abstract
Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the marginal gap and fracture resistance of 3D printing microfilled hybrid resin crowns in comparison to prefabricated zirconia crowns on pulpotomized primary teeth.
Materials and methods: Twenty primary molars were selected for the study and randomly divided into two groups (n = 10). Group1 received 3D printed microfilled hybrid resin crowns; Group 2 received prefabricated zirconia crowns. To simulate 6 months of oral conditions, thermodynamic cycling was performed, and the marginal gap was measured using a stereomicroscope with digital camera at 40 × magnification. For each sample, eight points along the margins for each axial surface were captured. The fracture resistance of each group was assessed by applying increasing load till crown fracture using a computer-controlled universal testing machine. Data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Data were analyzed using an independent t test. A significant level was set at P < 0.05.
Results: Regarding fracture resistance, 3D printed crowns group had statistically significant higher mean values than the prefabricated zirconia crowns group; the values were 1235.97 ± 412.12 N and 576.56 ± 221.53 N, respectively (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the marginal gap between the two types of crowns with average 32.00 ± 7.54 for 3D printed crowns and average 34.14 ± 9.79 for zirconia crowns (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: 3D printed microfilled hybrid resin crowns could be a suitable esthetic alternative for restoring pulp-treated primary molars. It is possible to provide an additional esthetic solution for the parents/children to satisfy the need for esthetic restoration of primary molars.
Clinical trial: Not applicable (in vitro study).
Keywords: 3D dental printer; Fracture resistance; Prefabricated zirconia crown; Primary molars.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry (FDASU-REC) as it was an in vitro study that used teeth collected from anonymous patients. The ethical approval number was FDASU-RECEM1228.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Wear on Primary Tooth Enamel and Fracture Resistance of Esthetic Pediatric Crowns Manufactured from Different Materials.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 13;60(10):1678. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101678. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39459465 Free PMC article.
-
Fracture resistance of prefabricated versus custom-made zirconia crowns after thermo-mechanical aging: an in-vitro study.BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 9;22(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02628-x. BMC Oral Health. 2022. PMID: 36494637 Free PMC article.
-
Marginal and internal adaptation and absolute marginal discrepancy of 3D-printed, milled, and prefabricated crowns for primary molar teeth: an in vitro comparative study.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05947-x. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40234877 Free PMC article.
-
3D printed endocrowns versus prefabricated zirconia crowns for pulpotomized primary molars: A randomized controlled trial.J Dent. 2025 Feb;153:105556. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105556. Epub 2025 Jan 6. J Dent. 2025. PMID: 39778737 Clinical Trial.
-
Thermomechanical aging effects on vertical marginal gap and fracture resistance: a comparative study of Bioflx and traditional pediatric crowns.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):1334. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05053-4. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39487502 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abbas LH, Wassel MO, Hassan IT, El-Dimeery AG, ElGhazawy RK. In-vitro comparison of marginal gap and fracture resistance of prefabricated zirconia crowns and three dimensional- printed endocrowns for restoration of pulpotomized primary molars. Int J Chem Biochem Sci. 2024;25(14):89–99.
-
- Agrawal R, Khanduja R, Singhal M, Gupta S, Kaushik M. Clinical evaluation of stainless steel crown versus zirconia crown in primary molars: an in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(1):15–9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2134 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ahmad SM, Dawood SN, Dalloo GAM, Al-Barazanchi TRH. Evaluation of mechanical properties of different polyetheretherketone endodontic post systems: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):537. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03193-7 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ajayakumar LP, Chowdhary N, Reddy VR, Chowdhary R. Use of restorative full crowns made with zirconia in children: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(5):551–8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1822 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Al-Haj AS. In vitro comparison of marginal and internal fit between stainless steel crowns and esthetic crowns of primary molars using different luting cements. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019;16(6):366–71. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous