Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Oct 14;27(9):2209-2224.
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaf118.

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2009-2025: Broad scope and implementation-A progress report

Affiliations
Review

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2009-2025: Broad scope and implementation-A progress report

Martin J van den Bent et al. Neuro Oncol. .

Abstract

Since its first activities in 2008 and 2009, the Response Assessment in NeuroOncology (RANO) group has given guidance on response assessment, trial design, and trial procedures to improve and standardize the way clinical trials in neurooncological studies are performed. To achieve its objectives, a variety of working groups have been initiated that cover many aspects of clinical trial design and outcome assessment in patients with tumors affecting the Central Nervous System. The RANO working groups are built on expertise without a formal structure, which makes rapid responses to new developments possible. RANO is aiming at evidence-based guidelines and recommendations, but in the absence of evidence will provide consensus-based guidance achieved by inviting recognized international experts. In its 15 years of existence, more than 60 RANO papers have been published mostly in high-ranking journals, and its recommendations have been accepted by regulators and industry as guiding principles. RANO organizes two meetings per year, one in conjunction with the annual American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting, and one during the annual Society for Neuro-Oncology meeting. These meetings are open, as are the working groups of RANO. New initiatives are welcomed.

Keywords: RANO; brain metastases; outcome criteria; primary brain tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC, Cairncross JG.. Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8(7):1277–1280. - PubMed
    1. van den Bent MJ, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Chang SM.. End point assessment in gliomas: novel treatments limit usefulness of classical Macdonald’s Criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(18):2905–2908. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1963–1972. - PubMed
    1. van den Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Schiff D, et al. Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(6):583–593. - PubMed
    1. Wen PY, van den Bent M, Youssef G, et al. RANO 2.0: update to the response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas in adults. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(33):5187–5199. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms