Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;51(2):243-249.
doi: 10.1111/aej.12945. Epub 2025 May 3.

Influence of Different Protocols of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units of High and Low Resolution on the Identification of Root Fractures

Affiliations

Influence of Different Protocols of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units of High and Low Resolution on the Identification of Root Fractures

Érica Pozo Mautone et al. Aust Endod J. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of different protocols of cone beam computed tomography units with image resolutions for identifying dental root fractures. Accordingly, 24 single-rooted teeth were endodontically prepared using gutta-percha, fibreglass, or metal. Root fractures were caused in 50% of the samples. The teeth were included in a dry jaw and scanned using two tomographic units: OP300 and 3D Veraview. These tomographs respectively achieved an accuracy of 0.88 and 0.83 and a sensitivity of 0.78 and 0.83. The OP300 Maxio device had a high specificity of 0.98 compared to the 3D Veraview's 0.83. Thus, the two devices tested were both adequate for the identification of root fractures. However, the 3D Veraview demonstrated greater accuracy in the detection of root fractures in roots containing metal posts, while the OP300 showed greater accuracy with the use of fibreglass posts. The presence of gutta-percha compromised the identification of fractures with both devices.

Keywords: cone beam computed tomography; fibreglass; gutta‐percha; metals; tooth fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dental Professional Community and Colleagues for excellence, Cracking the Cracked Tooth Code: Detection and Treatment of Various Longitudinal Tooth Fractures (American Association of Endodontists, 2008), 2–7.
    1. B. Bechara, C. Alex McMahan, W. S. Moore, M. Noujein, F. B. Teixeira, and H. Geha, “Cone Beam CT Scans With or Without Artefacts Reduction in Root Fracture Detection of Endodontically Treated Teeth,” Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 42, no. 5 (2013): 20120245.
    1. S. L. Melo, E. A. Bortoluzzi, M. Abreu Jr, L. R. Corrêa, and M. Corrêa, “Diagnostic Ability of a Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography Scan to Assess Longitudinal Root Fractures in Prosthetically Treated Teeth,” Journal of Endodontics 36, no. 10 (2010): 1879–1882.
    1. S. Cohen, L. H. Berman, L. Blanco, L. Bakland, and J. S. Kim, “A Demographic Analysis of Vertical Root Fractures,” Journal of Endodontics 32, no. 12 (2006): 1160–1163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.008.
    1. F. Mizuhashi, Y. Watarai, and I. Ogura, “Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures in Endodontically Treated Teeth by Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography,” Journal of Imaging 8, no. 3 (2022): 51–59.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources