Laparoscopic vs robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with prior abdominal surgery: a propensity-matched analysis
- PMID: 40319425
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02347-9
Laparoscopic vs robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with prior abdominal surgery: a propensity-matched analysis
Abstract
No studies have compared the efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robot-assisted gastrectomy (RG) for gastric cancer (GC) patients with a history of abdominal surgery (HAS). This is the first study in this field to identify complication-related factors and compare survival outcomes using propensity score matching (PSM) and a competing risk model (CRM). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on GC patients with HAS who underwent radical LG or RG. PSM was applied to achieve baseline balance. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with complications. CRM adjusted by inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) was used to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) across different TNM stages. PSM with a 3:1 ratio ensured baseline balance while minimizing sample loss (LG n = 87, RG n = 29). RG was associated with a significantly longer surgery duration but a lower incidence of overall and Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 2 complications. Multivariate analysis identified RG (OR, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.01-0.15), surgery duration (OR, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.00-1.01), and lymphadenectomy extent (OR, 95% CI: 2.81, 1.16-7.25) as independent factors associated with overall complications. Likewise, RG (OR, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.01-0.38), surgery duration (OR, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.00-1.02), and tumor size (OR, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.00-1.04) were independently associated with CD grade ≥ 2 complications. Kaplan-Meier analyses based on IPCW-adjusted CRM showed no significant differences in OS, CSS, and DFS between RG and LG across TNM stages. RG may efficiently reduce complications compared to LG but offers no survival benefit, suggesting a potential advantage in perioperative safety for GC patients with HAS.
Keywords: Cancer survival; Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Propensity score matching; Robotic gastrectomy.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: The study was conducted in full compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Juntendo University Hospital. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all participants through an opt-out approach.
References
-
- Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2023) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer 26(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8 - DOI
-
- Wang Y, Hong F, Li S et al (2023) Exploration and optimization of surgical techniques for laparoscopic transhiatal lower mediastinal lymph-node dissection for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: A prospective IDEAL 2a study with qualitative design. Chin J Cancer Res 35(2):163–175. https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.02.06 - DOI - PMC
-
- Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H et al (2020) Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(2):142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30332-2 - DOI
-
- Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH (2009) Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 249(6):927–932. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73 - DOI
-
- Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ et al (2021) Comprehensive learning curve of robotic surgery: discovery from a multicenter prospective trial of robotic gastrectomy. Ann Surg 273(5):949–956. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003583 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous