Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 May 4;19(1):196.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02347-9.

Laparoscopic vs robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with prior abdominal surgery: a propensity-matched analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Laparoscopic vs robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with prior abdominal surgery: a propensity-matched analysis

Yang Yu et al. J Robot Surg. .

Abstract

No studies have compared the efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robot-assisted gastrectomy (RG) for gastric cancer (GC) patients with a history of abdominal surgery (HAS). This is the first study in this field to identify complication-related factors and compare survival outcomes using propensity score matching (PSM) and a competing risk model (CRM). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on GC patients with HAS who underwent radical LG or RG. PSM was applied to achieve baseline balance. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with complications. CRM adjusted by inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) was used to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) across different TNM stages. PSM with a 3:1 ratio ensured baseline balance while minimizing sample loss (LG n = 87, RG n = 29). RG was associated with a significantly longer surgery duration but a lower incidence of overall and Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 2 complications. Multivariate analysis identified RG (OR, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.01-0.15), surgery duration (OR, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.00-1.01), and lymphadenectomy extent (OR, 95% CI: 2.81, 1.16-7.25) as independent factors associated with overall complications. Likewise, RG (OR, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.01-0.38), surgery duration (OR, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.00-1.02), and tumor size (OR, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.00-1.04) were independently associated with CD grade ≥ 2 complications. Kaplan-Meier analyses based on IPCW-adjusted CRM showed no significant differences in OS, CSS, and DFS between RG and LG across TNM stages. RG may efficiently reduce complications compared to LG but offers no survival benefit, suggesting a potential advantage in perioperative safety for GC patients with HAS.

Keywords: Cancer survival; Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Propensity score matching; Robotic gastrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: The study was conducted in full compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Juntendo University Hospital. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all participants through an opt-out approach.

References

    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2023) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer 26(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8 - DOI
    1. Wang Y, Hong F, Li S et al (2023) Exploration and optimization of surgical techniques for laparoscopic transhiatal lower mediastinal lymph-node dissection for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: A prospective IDEAL 2a study with qualitative design. Chin J Cancer Res 35(2):163–175. https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.02.06 - DOI - PMC
    1. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H et al (2020) Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(2):142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30332-2 - DOI
    1. Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH (2009) Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 249(6):927–932. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73 - DOI
    1. Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ et al (2021) Comprehensive learning curve of robotic surgery: discovery from a multicenter prospective trial of robotic gastrectomy. Ann Surg 273(5):949–956. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003583 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources