Navigating Family Leave in Cardiothoracic Surgery Training
- PMID: 40320197
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.04.013
Navigating Family Leave in Cardiothoracic Surgery Training
Abstract
Background: Cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) training may coincide with family needs including pregnancy, illness, birth/adoption/fostering of a child, and care for family members. Certifying bodies set requirements and limits on family leave, complicating the navigation of family needs during training. Our goal is to examine policies of medical boards and their alignment with the 2022 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education policy and to develop a practical tool to help trainees and program directors navigate family leave.
Methods: A literature review was conducted with PubMed of publications published from July 2022 to September 2024 focusing on family leave within surgical specialties. This study reviews family leave policies, requirements, and benefits of certifying bodies. Data from the American Association of Medical Colleges, American Boards of Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education were analyzed to understand gender distribution and policy variations between surgical specialties.
Results: There was no publication discussing family leave in CTS. Of 40 reviewed publications, 12 concluded that parental leave policies are unclear or insufficient. Publications were found to focus on perspectives and experiences but to lack actionable solutions. Family leave policies vary, with inconsistencies in duration and flexibility. The duration of leave was not linked with gender representation in specialty.
Conclusions: Comprehensive family leave policies are needed to assist programs and trainees in navigating family leave in CTS.
Copyright © 2025 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures Cherie Erkmen reports a relationship with Pfizer–American Cancer Society Health Disparity Award that includes: funding grants; with the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants; and with The Merck Foundation that includes: funding grants. Anastasiia K. Tompkins reports a relationship with the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants. Omowunmi Akinade reports a relationship with LUNGevity Foundation that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.