Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug;28(8):1268-1279.
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.04.2160. Epub 2025 May 2.

A Comparative Study of Health and Well-Being Measures in Ireland Using EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) and its Short Version, EQ-5D-5L, and ICEpop Capability Measure for Adults (ICECAP-A)

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

A Comparative Study of Health and Well-Being Measures in Ireland Using EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) and its Short Version, EQ-5D-5L, and ICEpop Capability Measure for Adults (ICECAP-A)

Irina Kinchin et al. Value Health. 2025 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: The EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) is a new experimental measure of health and well-being, having been validated in an increasing number of countries and languages. This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the EQ-HWB and its short version (EQ-HWB-S) in Ireland and compare them with the EQ-5D-5L and ICEpop Capability Measure for Adults (ICECAP-A).

Methods: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from a 2023 Irish general population survey (n = 1220). The survey included the EQ-HWB, EQ-5D-5L, ICECAP-A, and socioeconomic and health-related questions. EQ-HWB-S responses were derived from the EQ-HWB. The UK or Irish value sets were used for each measure to compute index values. Ceiling effects, convergent, divergent validity, and known-group validity were assessed and exploratory factor analysis was conducted.

Results: Mean index values were 0.755, 0.760 to 0.830, and 0.807 for the EQ-HWB-S, EQ-5D-5L, and ICECAP-A, respectively. Ceiling effects were 3%, 7%, 23%, and 15% for EQ-HWB, EQ-HWB-S, EQ-5D-5L, and ICECAP-A. EQ-HWB-S index values correlated strongly with EQ-5D-5L (r = 0.740-0.759) and ICECAP-A (r = 0.604) index values. All measures demonstrated good known-group validity for health-related variables, with EQ-5D-5L performing best overall. Factor analysis identified 5 factors: psychosocial health, pain and discomfort, sensory and physical functioning, capability well-being, and positive psychological states. Feeling settled and secure was the only ICECAP-A item that loaded onto the same factor (psychosocial health) as any of the EQ-HWB items.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the measurement performance of EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S with ICECAP-A. The EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S showed good psychometric performance in an Irish population sample. Limited overlap was observed between EQ-HWB and ICECAP-A well-being concepts.

Keywords: EQ-5D-5L; EQ-HWB; EQ-HWB-S; ICECAP-A; capability well-being; health-related quality of life; psychometric analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section. Dr Lidia Engel is an editor for Value in Health and had no role in the peer-review process of this article.

Similar articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources