Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 5;12(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s40348-025-00194-0.

Progress of personalized medicine of cystic fibrosis in the times of efficient CFTR modulators

Affiliations
Review

Progress of personalized medicine of cystic fibrosis in the times of efficient CFTR modulators

Burkhard Tümmler et al. Mol Cell Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a systemic disorder of exocrine glands that is caused by mutations in the CFTR gene.

Main body: The basic defect in people with CF (pwCF) leads to impaired epithelial transport of chloride and bicarbonate that can be assessed by CFTR biomarkers, i.e. the β-adrenergic sweat rate and sweat chloride concentration (SCC), chloride conductance of the nasal respiratory epithelium (NPD), urine secretion of bicarbonate, intestinal current measurements (ICM) of chloride secretory responses in rectal biopsies and in bioassays of chloride transport in organoids or cell cultures. CFTR modulators are a novel class of drugs that improve defective posttranslational processing, trafficking and function of mutant CFTR. By April 2025, triple combination therapy with the CFTR potentiator ivacaftor (IVA) and the CFTR correctors elexacaftor (ELX) and tezacaftor (TEZ) has been approved in Europe for the treatment of all pwCF who do not carry two minimal function CFTR mutations. Previous phase 3 and post-approval phase 4 studies in pwCF who harbour one or two alleles of the major mutation F508del consistently reported significant improvements of lung function and anthropometry upon initiation of ELX/TEZ/IVA compared to baseline. Normalization of SCC, NPD and ICM correlated with clinical outcomes on the population level, but the restoration of CFTR function was diverse and not predictive for clinical outcome in the individual patient. Theratyping of non-F508del CF genotypes in patient-derived organoids and cell cultures revealed for most cases clinically meaningful increases of CFTR activity upon exposure to ELX/TEZ/IVA. Likewise, every second CF patient with non-F508del genotypes improved in SCC and clinical outcome upon exposure to ELX/TEZ/IVA indicating that triple CFTR modulator therapy is potentially beneficial for all pwCF who do not carry two minimal function CFTR mutations. This group who is not eligible for CFTR modulators may opt for gene addition therapy in the future, as the first-in-human trial with a recombinant lentiviral vector is underway.

Future directions: The upcoming generation of pwCF will probably experience a rather normal life in childhood and adolescence. To classify the upcoming personal signatures of CF disease in the times of efficient modulators, we need more sensitive CFTR biomarkers that address the long-term course of airway and gut microbiome, host defense, epithelial homeostasis and multiorgan metabolism.

Keywords: Biomarker; CFTR; Cystic fibrosis; Elexacaftor; Gene therapy; Ivacaftor; Tezacaftor; Theratyping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: B.T. reports grants and contracts from the German Research Foundation (DFG), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the Volkswagen Stiftung with payments made to the institution; personal fees for advisory board participation and educational events from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; lecture honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and streamedup! GmbH. S.T.P. reports grants and contracts from the Mukoviszidose e.V., the Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) with payments made to the institution and travel support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. A-M.D. reports grants and contracts from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, European Cystic Fibrosis Society Clinical Trial Network (ECFS-CTN) and Christiane Herzog Stiftung with payments made to the institution, personal fees from the c4c consortium, GSK and European Cystic Fibrosis Society. S.Y.G. reports grants from Mukoviszidose e.V. (German CF Foundation) and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated with payments made to institution; personal fees for advisory board participation from Chiesi GmbH and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; lecture honoraria and honoraria for a CME module from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. L.N. reports grants and contracts from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), the European Cystic Fibrosis Society and Vertex Pharmaceuticals with payments made to the institution. O. S. reports grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) with payment made to the institution and honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated for lectures. M.A.M. reports grants and contracts from the German Research Foundation (DFG), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics and Vertex Pharmaceuticals with payments made to the institution; personal fees for advisory board participation or consulting from Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotech, Splisense, Vertex Pharmaceuticals; lecture honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex Pharmaceuticals.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Venn diagram of the response of CFTR biomarkers of pwCF with one or two F508del alleles to 8–16 weeks of treatment with ELX/TEZ/IVA compared to baseline. The Venn diagram indicates the number of participants who normalized the response to the respective biomarker. A study participant showed a normalized response in the respective biomarker if SCC was below 60 mmol/L in QPIT [63], NPD had revealed a Sermet score of more than 0.27 [87], and the chloride secretory responses in the ICM had reached 70% of the mean normal values for at least two of three criteria, i.e. the response to activation with forskolin/IBMX, response to carbachol or the sum of the two responses [85, 91, 92]. Of the 79 study participants, 52 pwCF had been modulator naïve at baseline and 27 pwCF were administered combination therapy with tezacaftor and ivacaftor for at least six months. The numbers in brackets indicate modulator-naïve (left) and TEZ/IVA-positive pwCF at baseline (right) (Source: The authors’ Modulate-CF DZL consortium Berlin, Gießen, Hannover, Heidelberg [157])
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Personal clinical outcome and response to CFTR biomarkers of pwCF with one or two F508del alleles to 8–16 weeks of treatment with ELX/TEZ/IVA compared to baseline. Patients’ BMI and FEV1 values were mapped onto the age- and gender-corrected percentile distribution of the 2013 edition of the CF European registry [209]. Next, the FEV1 and BMI percentiles were combined into the CF disease percentile, which gives equal weight to lung function and anthropometry [211]. The figure shows for each of the 79 study participants the coordinate of CF disease percentiles at baseline and after 8–16 weeks exposure to ELX/TEZ/IVA. The diagonal separates individuals with improved or worsened percentile ranks upon initiation of ELX/TEZ/IVA. The individual’s normalization of CFTR biomarkers (defined as in Fig. 1) is indicated by symbol: asterisk, no normalization; red triangle, solely SCC [63]; blue triangle: solely NPD Sermet score [87]; yellow triangle, solely ICM [85, 91, 92]; purple square, SCC and NPD Sermet score; green square, NPD Sermet score and ICM; brown square; SCC and ICM; open circle, SCC + NPD Sermet score + ICM (Source: The authors’ Modulate-CF DZL consortium Berlin, Gießen, Hannover, Heidelberg [157])

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Childs B (1999) Genetic Medicine: A Logic of Disease. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
    1. Mall MA, Burgel PR, Castellani C, Davies JC, Salathe M, Taylor-Cousar JL (2024) Cystic fibrosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 10:53. 10.1038/s41572-024-00538-6 - PubMed
    1. Grasemann H, Ratjen F (2023) Cystic Fibrosis. N Engl J Med 389:1693–1707. 10.1056/NEJMra2216474 - PubMed
    1. Guo J, King I, Hill A (2024) International disparities in diagnosis and treatment access for cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 59:1622–1630. 10.1002/ppul.26954 - PubMed
    1. Bobadilla JL, Macek M Jr, Fine JP, Farrell PM (2002) Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations–correlation with incidence data and application to screening. Hum Mutat 19:575–606. 10.1002/humu.10041 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources