Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov;77(11):1384-1392.
doi: 10.1002/acr.25567. Epub 2025 Jun 22.

Validation of Lung Ultrasound Interpretation Criteria for Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis and Inflammatory Myopathy

Affiliations

Validation of Lung Ultrasound Interpretation Criteria for Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis and Inflammatory Myopathy

Robert M Fairchild et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has a high prevalence in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and inflammatory myopathy (IM), and early identification reduces associated morbidity and mortality. We previously developed lung ultrasound (LUS) interpretation criteria for ILD detection in 2020 (LUS-ILD-20) showing excellent sensitivity and specificity in patients with SSc-ILD; herein, we sought to validate a revised LUS-ILD-24 in a large cohort with SSc and IM.

Methods: Patients meeting criteria for SSc and IM, with planned computed tomography (CT) chest imaging underwent LUS imaging interpreted with LUS-ILD-24 by three blinded readers. The sensitivity and specificity for LUS-ILD detection as noted on CT was analyzed for subgroups with SSc, IM, and possible incident ILD. Inter- and intrarater agreements were calculated. Correlations between LUS-ILD-24 severity, CT imaging severity, and pulmonary function tests were assessed.

Results: Ninety-five patients were included in the analyses. Sensitivity and specificity for ILD detection ranged from 92.4% to 95.5% and 82.8% to 86.2% across readers with similar accuracy in all subgroups. Inter- and intrareader reliability showed near perfect agreement (κ = 0.92 and κ = 0.90 to 1, respectively). LUS severity correlated with CT imaging severity and inversely correlated with diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide and forced vital capacity.

Conclusion: We validated our revised LUS-ILD-24 in cohorts with SSc and IM and found excellent sensitivity, specificity, and reliability for detection of ILD identified on CT imaging. LUS severity correlated with CT and pulmonary function test markers of ILD severity. Validation of the revised LUS-ILD-24 supports the implementation of LUS imaging in screening algorithms for ILD in patients with SSc and IM.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Gutsche M, Rosen GD, Swigris JJ. Connective tissue disease‐associated interstitial lung disease: a review. Curr Respir Care Rep 2012;1(4):224–232.
    1. Joy GM, Arbiv OA, Wong CK, et al. Prevalence, imaging patterns and risk factors of interstitial lung disease in connective tissue disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2023;32(167):220210.
    1. Molberg Ø, Hoffmann‐Vold AM. Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: progress in screening and early diagnosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2016;28(6):613–618.
    1. Steen VD, Medsger TA. Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972–2002. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66(7):940–944.
    1. Johnson SR, Bernstein EJ, Bolster MB, et al. 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) guideline for the screening and monitoring of interstitial lung disease in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheumatol 2024;76(8):1201–1213.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources