Mortality in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 40321321
- PMCID: PMC12045539
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006721
Mortality in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) represents one of the most common congenital anomalies among live births globally. Morbidity associated with CLP is well documented in the literature and stratified through measures such as disability-adjusted life years. However, a paucity of literature details mortality rates among different subgroups of patients with CLP.
Methods: A meta-analysis was performed using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. Included studies reported on mortality rates of patients with CLP in a liveborn cohort. Studies that reported only intraoperative mortality, included fetal mortality, or included non-CLP conditions in mortality rates were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed through subgroup analysis using random-effects models.
Results: Twenty-one studies were included. Mortality rates ranged from 1.22% to 19.8% between studies. Patients with isolated cleft lip had lower odds of mortality compared with CLP (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28 [0.14, 0.56], P = 0.005) or isolated palate (OR = 0.34 [0.24, 0.48], P = 0.0005). Increased odds of mortality were found in patients with comorbidities (OR = 19.79 [11.37, 34.43], P < 0.0001) compared with otherwise healthy CLP patients. Across age groups, neonates (0-28 d) had the highest mortality rate (0.7%-19.8%) followed by infants (0.2%-6.6%), both with P values less than 0.05.
Conclusions: Mortality rates in patients with CLP are higher for those with an additional comorbidity or younger age (<1 y). Further studies stratifying data by cleft phenotype and age are required to better understand factors that contribute to CLP mortality.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Cervical vertebrae anomalies and cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Dec;48(8):20190085. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190085. Epub 2019 Jul 23. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31271540 Free PMC article.
-
The incidence of congenital anomalies associated with cleft palate/cleft lip and palate in neonates in the Konya region, Turkey.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep;50(6):541-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Aug 30. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 21880407
-
Cleft Lip and Palate in Newborns Diagnosed With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jan;164(1):199-205. doi: 10.1177/0194599820944899. Epub 2020 Jul 21. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021. PMID: 32689883
-
Cranial Base Angle in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 Jan;60(1):39-54. doi: 10.1177/10556656211053545. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023. PMID: 34787478
-
Incidence of oral clefts among different ethnicities in the state of California.Ann Plast Surg. 2014 May;72 Suppl 1:S81-3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000164. Ann Plast Surg. 2014. PMID: 24691321
References
-
- Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, et al. . Cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 2009;374:1773–1785. - PubMed
-
- Watkins SE, Meyer RE, Strauss RP, et al. . Classification, epidemiology, and genetics of orofacial clefts. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41:149–163. - PubMed
-
- Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. The prevalence of congenital anomalies in Europe. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;686:349–364. - PubMed
-
- Banu T, Sharma S, Chowdhury TK, et al. ; GICS. Surgically correctable congenital anomalies: reducing morbidity and mortality in the first 8000 days of life. World J Surg. 2023;47:3408–3418. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous