Comparison of Results of Primary Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With and Without Silicon Stent Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 40321389
- PMCID: PMC12044122
- DOI: 10.1007/s12070-025-05453-0
Comparison of Results of Primary Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With and Without Silicon Stent Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLD) causes continuous epiphora. NLD is mainly treated by dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). There are different opinions about the use of silicone stents in studies. Some support it, but others do not recommend it due to side effects. This study was done to evaluate and compare the results of endoscopic DCR with and without silicone stenting. In this randomized clinical trial study, a total of 66 patients with NLD obstruction were enrolled and were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A underwent the DCR without silicone stent while Group B underwent the DCR with stent. Two groups were compared in terms of success rate and incidence of complications. twenty-one men and forty- five women participated in this study, and the two groups did not have a statistically significant difference (P = 0.42). The average age in group A was 52.63 ± 12.66 years and in group B was 57.60 ± 14.51 years, which had no significant difference (P = 0.14). The overall success rate after twelve months was 96.8% and 96.7% in groups A and, B respectively. However, there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.98). The incidence of complications in the two groups was low. At 12 months postoperatively, 3 (6.66%) out of 66 patients had complications. The use of silicone stents does not affect the results of endoscopic DCR. Complications and success rates were similar in the two groups, DCR with a stent was not superior to without a stent.
Keywords: Chronic dacryocystitis; Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy; Epiphora; Nasolacrimal duct obstruction; Silicon tube stent.
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2025. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of InterestNone.
Similar articles
-
Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 24;2(2):CD007097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007097.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28231605 Free PMC article.
-
Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):CD011109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011109.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28700811 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With and Without Stent Versus External DCR.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):4405-4410. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04874-7. Epub 2024 Jul 22. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 39376442
-
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599. Online ahead of print. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40569278
-
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1:CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8. PMID: 36384212 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
-
- Ejder Ci_ger, Mustafa K, Balci Sec¸il, Arslano_glu E Eren (2018) Endoscopic-Powered dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting: Long-term outcomes of 120 procedures. Am J Rhinol Allergy 32(4):303–309 - PubMed
-
- Ibrahim Cukurova GC, Mercan E, Cetinkaya, Gumusssoy M, Hakan Soken (2013) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: outcomes using mucosal flap preserving technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(5):1661–1666 - PubMed
-
- Vlad Budu T, Decuseara B, Mocanu R, Baican M, Tusaliu D, Cojocaru et al (2016) Stent technique for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy our expertise. Romanian J Rhinology 6(21):23–27