Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 30:18:2387-2399.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S510034. eCollection 2025.

Instruments for Assessing Patient Independence in Self-Care: A Scoping Review

Theresia Eriyani  1 , Iwan Shalahuddin  2 , Sandra Pebrianti  3 , Indra Maulana  4
Affiliations
Review

Instruments for Assessing Patient Independence in Self-Care: A Scoping Review

Theresia Eriyani et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. .

Abstract

Aim: Measuring patients' independence in caring for themselves is essential in nursing care, especially in the internal medicine room environment. Many patients with various conditions need help in self-care.

Objective: To identify the right instrument to measure patients' level of independence in performing self-care.

Methods: The scoping review uses the PICO framework through PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus databases.

Results: Nine instruments/measuring tools can be used to measure the level of independence of patients in self-care, namely CDS, Barthel Index and MBI (Modified Barthel Index), SCHFI, ECOG, Self-care ability questionnaire, DCTAQ, and Revised Summary of Diabetes Self-Care.

Conclusion: Some instruments have various assessment methods and scores but can provide helpful information for health practitioners to assess patient independence. The instrument has been tested for validity and reliability in multiple studies. No instrument is absolutely the best, as each instrument has its advantages according to its context and purpose of use.

Keywords: internal medicine; measuring instruments; patient Independence level; self-care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram. Adapted from Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018;169:467–473. Creative Commons.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Riegel B, Moser DK, Buck HG, et al. Self-care for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6. 10.1161/JAHA.117.006997 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sugiharti N, Rohita T, Rosdiana N, Nurkholik D. The relationship between family support and the level of independence in self-care (Self-Care) in stroke patients in the Ciamis sub-district area. J Keperawatan Galuh. 2020;2:79. doi:10.25157/jkg.v2i2.4538 - DOI
    1. Heijmans M, Waverijn G, Rademakers J, van der Vaart R, Rijken M. Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:41–48. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Safitri R, Ulmy Mahmud N, Sulaeman U. The relationship between health literacy and self-care management of diabetes mellitus patients at Tenriawaru Hospital, Bone Regency. Wind Public Heal J. 2022;3:635–646. doi:10.33096/woph.v3i4.51 - DOI
    1. Navidian A, Yaghoubinia F, Ganjali A, Khoshsimaee S. The effect of self-care education on the awareness, attitude, and adherence to self-care behaviors in hospitalized patients due to heart failure with and without depression. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130973. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130973 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources