Inpatient Cost Avoidance and Uncompensated Labor Associated With Different Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Care Models
- PMID: 40322270
- PMCID: PMC12048796
- DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf244
Inpatient Cost Avoidance and Uncompensated Labor Associated With Different Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Care Models
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Inpatient Cost Avoidance and Uncompensated Labor Associated With Different Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Care Models.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 24;12(6):ofaf363. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf363. eCollection 2025 Jun. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40568007 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) decreases length of stay and inpatient costs while benefiting patients. However, costs in the ambulatory setting are poorly quantified. To address this gap, we examined both inpatient costs avoided and uncompensated labor associated with OPAT delivered via 3 administration models: self-administration (S-OPAT), home care agencies/hemodialysis centers (HH-OPAT), and skilled nursing facilities (SNF-OPAT).
Methods: The length and type of treatment and postdischarge nonbillable encounters were reviewed via the electronic health record for all adult patients admitted to a large urban hospital and discharged on OPAT during two 3-month periods. Average daily inpatient care costs for Texas state hospitals and antibiotic wholesale acquisition costs were used to estimate OPAT costs and savings. Antibiotics with different formulations were converted to equivalent daily doses and their corresponding costs were averaged to estimate a daily cost.
Results: Among 342 patient records examined during the study periods, which accounted for 8656 inpatient days avoided, there were 211.1 nonbillable encounters per 100 patient-days of OPAT for patients discharged in SNF-OPAT, 9.1 in HH-OPAT, and 6.4 in S-OPAT (P = .028). The estimated cost avoided per 100 patient-days was $376 400 or approximately $5 430 197 per month.
Conclusions: A substantial burden of uncompensated labor was associated with all OPAT modalities; however, coordinating care with skilled nursing facilities was significantly more demanding when adjusted for days of OPAT. All OPAT models generated significant institutional savings, which are typically overestimated as they fail to account for the uncompensated support provided by the ambulatory care staff.
Keywords: cost; nonbillable visits; outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy; savings; uncompensated labor.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
References
-
- Paladino JA, Poretz D. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy today. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51(Suppl 2):S198–208. - PubMed
-
- Quintens C, Steffens E, Jacobs K, et al. Efficacy and safety of a Belgian tertiary care outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program. Infection 2020; 48:357–66. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
