Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 4:103:skaf148.
doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf148.

Evaluation of the residual feed intake on carcass and meat quality traits of Nellore bulls: a biochemical and molecular approach

Affiliations

Evaluation of the residual feed intake on carcass and meat quality traits of Nellore bulls: a biochemical and molecular approach

Daniela A Vesga et al. J Anim Sci. .

Abstract

This study aimed to compare dry matter intake (DMI), feed efficiency, carcass traits, and meat quality between feedlot Bos indicus cattle with divergent residual feed intake (RFI). Ninety-six Nellore bulls (initial body weight 362.45 ± 25.6 kg, aged 24-26 months) underwent a 70-d feed efficiency test in a group-pen system equipped with individual feed intake and weight gain monitoring. After classification into low (efficient) and high (inefficient) RFI groups (-0.54 vs. 0.59 kg/d, respectively), the animals were slaughtered at a final body weight of 520 ± 31 kg after 120 days of feeding. Differences (P < 0.05) were observed between low and high RFI groups for DMI (9.14 vs. 10.42 kg/d; P < 0.05), and feed conversion (6.06 vs. 6.74 kg/kg; P < 0.05), and RFI (P < 0.05). Carcass traits differed (P < 0.05) between low vs. high RFI experimental groups (dressing percentage [DP]: 54.44 vs. 53.23 %; P < 0.05 and backfat thickness [BFT]: 4.75 vs. 5.61 mm; P < 0.05), with a tendency towards greater ribeye area (REA) in the low RFI group (86.05 vs. 82.91 cm²; P = 0.07). Less intramuscular fat content (IMF = 1.43 vs. 1.75 %; P < 0.05) and myofibrillar fragmentation index (MFI = 27.04 vs. 32.15 at 5 days of aging; and 53.01 vs. 68.3; P < 0.01 at 15 days of aging) were reported in low RFI cattle, while other parameters such as pH, color (L*, a*, b*), cooking loss, shear force (WBSF), or lipid oxidation did not differ (P > 0.05) between RFI groups. After 15 days of aging, there was an increase in L* (P < 0.01) and a decrease in pH, a*, b*, and WBSF (P < 0.01) regardless of RFI group. Sensory analysis revealed smaller scores (P < 0.05) for juiciness (55.3 vs. 58.91) and overall acceptability (58.3 vs. 63.6) in low RFI cattle. Lipidomic analysis identified a difference in 60 lipid species (P < 0.05) between groups, including diacylglycerols, free fatty acids, phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylethanolamines, sphingomyelins, and triacylglycerols. Nellore bulls with low RFI had leaner carcasses with less backfat and tended to have larger ribeye areas. Their meat contained less intramuscular fat and more drip loss, which negatively impacted sensory quality as perceived by consumers. This study is the first to characterize the lipidome of beef cattle with divergent RFI, revealing lipid classes linked to mitochondrial function and lipid storage, which may help explain differences in feed efficiency, carcass, and meat quality traits.

Keywords: Bos indicus; beef cattle; feedlot; intramuscular fat; lipidomics.

Plain language summary

We hypothesized that feed efficiency, carcass characteristics, and meat quality traits would vary between residual feed intake (RFI) phenotypes. Efficient Nellore bulls (low RFI) consumed less feed than their inefficient counterparts (high RFI) while maintaining similar weight gain. However, the low RFI group produced carcasses with less fat and tended to have greater ribeye area. Meat from low RFI bulls exhibited less intramuscular fat. While tenderness and color were similar between groups, consumers rated the meat of efficient cattle as slightly less juicy and flavorful. Further analysis using lipid profiling revealed differences in fat composition, with variations in specific types of fats linked to energy utilization and storage in the animals. These findings indicate that improving feed efficiency in Nellore bulls can reduce resource use and production costs but may also affect meat quality, particularly sensory attributes. Striking a balance between feed efficiency and meat quality is essential for sustainable and consumer-accepted beef production.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Aaslyng, M. D., Meinert L., Bejerholm C., and Warner R... 2014. Sensory Assessment Of Meat. In: Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences. Elsevier. p. 272–279. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/B978-0-12-384731-7.00253-1 - DOI
    1. ABIEC. 2022. Beef report: Profile of cattle raising in Brazil. Assoc. Bras. Ind. Exp . Carne, São Paulo, Brazil. 72 p.
    1. Alexandre, P. A., Kogelman L. J. A. A., Santana M. H. A. A., Passarelli D., Pulz L. H., Fantinato-Neto P., Silva P. L., Leme P. R., Strefezzi R. F., Coutinho L. L.,. et al. 2015. Liver transcriptomic networks reveal main biological processes associated with feed efficiency in beef cattle. BMC Gen 16:1–13. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12864-015-2292-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antonelo, D. S., dos Santos-Donado P. R., Ferreira C. R., Colnago L. A., Ocampos F. M., Ribeiro G. H., and Balieiro J. C... 2022a. Exploratory lipidome and metabolome profiling contributes to understanding differences in high and normal ultimate pH beef. Meat Sci. 194:108978. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108978 - DOI - PubMed
    1. AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International.

LinkOut - more resources