Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug;32(8):5909-5918.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17264-2. Epub 2025 May 5.

Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grade After Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grade After Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Giovanni Capovilla et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The higher rate of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is an argument to support this treatment. However, previous studies have not demonstrated a survival benefit of NACRT for adenocarcinoma (ADC) compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the correlation between pathological tumor response (pTR) and survival is unclear. We aimed to verify whether the prognostic value of pTRis influenced by the type of neoadjuvant treatment performed.

Methods: Patients with ADC who underwent NACT or NACRT and surgery between 2015 and 2020 were included. The correlation between pTR and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after both treatments was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. pTR was assessed by using the Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG).

Results: Overall, 563 patients were included; 278 received NACT, and 285 NACRT. The incidence of pCR was significantly higher after NACRT (24.6% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.0001). The TRG of both node-negative (pN0) and node-positive (pN+) patients significantly correlated with the 5 years OS after NACT (pN0 p = 0.03, pN+ p = 0.01). The same result was not detected in NACRT patients (pN0 p = 0.98, pN+ p = 0.23). The 5-year DFS of the patients with pCR was higher in the NACT group (84% vs. 66.5%, p = 0.05). The proportion of patients showing distant recurrences was significantly higher in the NACRT group (35.4% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.009).

Conclusions: Tumor regression grade was significantly associated with survival after NACT, but not with NACRT. Despite a lower rate of pCR, both OS and, especially, DFS of patients with pCR improved after NACT compared with NACRT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Sara Lonardi: Research funding (to Institution) from Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daichii Sankyo, Hutchinson, Incyte, Merck Serono, Mirati, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, personal honoraria as invited speaker from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, GSK, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Servier; Participation in advisory board for Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Incyte, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Servier, Takeda, Rottapharm, Beigene, Fosum, Nimbus Therapeutics. Peter Grimminger: Proctor for Intuitive Surgical, Advisor for Medicaroid Europe, Medtronic, Richard Wolf and JnJ.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing 5-year OS and 5-year DFS by TRG grade of pN0 and pN+ patients after NACT. OS overall survival; DFS disease-free survival; NACT neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NACRT neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing 5-year OS and 5-year DFS by TRG grade of pN0 and pN+ patients after NACRT. OS overall survival; DFS disease-free survival; NACT neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NACRT neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing 5-year OS A and 5-year DFS B of patients with pathological complete response (pCR) after NACT and NACRT. OS overall survival; DFS disease-free survival; NACT neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NACRT neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

References

    1. Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Corvera C, Das P, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019;17:855–83. - PubMed
    1. Shah MA, Kennedy EB, Catenacci DV, Deighton DC, Goodman KA, Malhotra NK, et al. Treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2677–94. - PubMed
    1. Hoeppner J, Brunner T, Schmoor C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(4):323–35. - PubMed
    1. Reynolds JV, Preston SR, O’Neill B, et al. Trimodality therapy versus perioperative chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction (Neo-AEGIS): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8(11):1015–27. 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00243-1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Favi F, Bollschweiler E, Berlth F, Plum P, Hescheler DA, Alakus H, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus? A propensity score-matched study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:1572–80. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources