Not yet nixing rabbit eyes from the six: the TTT is not predicting the full range of in vivo eye irritation classifications for agrochemical formulations
- PMID: 40324557
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105841
Not yet nixing rabbit eyes from the six: the TTT is not predicting the full range of in vivo eye irritation classifications for agrochemical formulations
Abstract
Since its adoption as a test guideline (EIT, OECD test guideline (TG) 492) in 2015, the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test has been the in vitro method of choice to identify agrochemical formulations non-irritant to the eye (neither category 1 nor 2, according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, GHS). For serious eye damage (GHS category 1), however, none of the in vitro test methods including the bovine cornea opacity and permeability test (BCOP, OECD TG 437, and protocol modifications), the isolated chicken eye test (ICE, OECD TG 438), the ocular irritation assay (OECD TG 496) or the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assay proved sufficiently sensitive to correctly identify agrochemical formulations classified as seriously eye damaging in vivo. In 2022, the OECD adopted a new in vitro test guideline for identifying chemicals inducing serious eye damage, eye irritation, and chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation (OECD TG 492B). However, within the formal validation study of this time-to-toxicity (TTT) test method, agrochemical formulations were not included. To assess the applicability of this test to agrochemical formulations 25 formulations with historical in vivo data were assessed in the TTT. The TTT correctly predicted 0 %, 90 % and 50 % of the agrochemical formulations which were classified by the in vivo data into the three categories 1, 2 and "not classified", respectively. The overall accuracy of the TTT to predict agrochemical formulations of the three categories was 52 %. Therefore, to facilitate non-animal-based identification of the full range of ocular irritation of agrochemical formulations, testing protocols and/or prediction models must be revised or classification guidelines should be adjusted to align with human relevant in vitro testing rather than relying on in vivo Draize data as a reference point.
Keywords: Agrochemical formulation; Classification; Serious eye damage; Time-to-toxicity.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Susanne Noreen Kolle, Peggy Haase, Britta Wareing, Dorothee Funk-Weyer and Robert Landsiedel report a relationship with BASF SE that includes employment. Monika Kemeny and Stefan Stinchcombe report a relationship with BASF Agricultural Solutions that includes employment.
Similar articles
-
The EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test is the Method of Choice for the In Vitro Eye Irritation Testing of Agrochemical Formulations: Correlation Analysis of EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test and BCOP Test Data According to the UN GHS, US EPA and Brazil ANVISA Classification Schemes.Altern Lab Anim. 2015 Jul;43(3):181-98. doi: 10.1177/026119291504300307. Altern Lab Anim. 2015. PMID: 26256396
-
Lacking applicability of in vitro eye irritation methods to identify seriously eye irritating agrochemical formulations: Results of bovine cornea opacity and permeability assay, isolated chicken eye test and the EpiOcular™ ET-50 method to classify according to UN GHS.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Apr;85:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Feb 2. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28163171
-
Defined approaches to predict GHS and EPA classifications for ocular irritation potential of agrochemical formulations.Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2025 Sep;44(3):233-249. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2025.2499552. Epub 2025 May 15. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2025. PMID: 40375494
-
Human-relevant approaches to assess eye corrosion/irritation potential of agrochemical formulations.Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2021 Jun;40(2):145-167. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2021.1910291. Epub 2021 Apr 20. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2021. PMID: 33830843 Review.
-
Validating and troubleshooting ocular in vitro toxicology tests.J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2010 Mar-Apr;61(2):136-45. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Jan 22. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2010. PMID: 20096797 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous