Muscadine Grape Skin Extract in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Biomarker-Enriched Trial in Patients With the SOD2 Ala/Ala Variant
- PMID: 40325900
- DOI: 10.1002/pros.24903
Muscadine Grape Skin Extract in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Biomarker-Enriched Trial in Patients With the SOD2 Ala/Ala Variant
Abstract
Background: Many patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCRPC) prefer to delay androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) due to its adverse effects, highlighting the need for better-tolerated, effective alternatives. A subgroup analysis of our prior Phase II trial showed that muscadine grape skin extract (MPX) increased PSA doubling time (PSADT) in patients with SOD2 Ala/Ala variant which provided the rationale for this trial.
Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted at 14 sites, evaluated patients with BCRPC and SOD2 Ala/Ala genotype. Patients received 4000 mg MPX or placebo daily. The primary endpoint was on-study PSA slope with comparisons between treatment arms. Secondary endpoints were PSADT, PSA response (≥ 50% decrease), and PSA progression free survival (PFS). Correlative studies included markers of oxidative stress and gastrointestinal microbiota composition.
Results: At interim analysis, fifty-nine patients were randomized (MPX, n = 29; placebo, n = 30). On-study PSA slopes at 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks showed no significant differences between the MPX and placebo arms (p = 0.49). The study was stopped due to futility. No significant differences were observed in PSADT, PSA response, median PSA PFS, or oxidative stress biomarkers. MPX was well-tolerated, with no grade 3-4 AEs attributable to the study drug. Microbiome analysis showed no significant differences in alpha diversity but revealed increased relative abundance of Roseburia faecis and Akkermansia muciniphila in the MPX group.
Conclusions: Although MPX supplementation had no significant effect on PSA slope in men with BCRPC and SOD2 Ala/Ala variant, this study provides a rigorous evaluation of a natural product and highlights the importance of well-designed clinical trials in advancing evidence-based integrative oncology.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials. gov, NCT03535675.
Keywords: biochemical recurrence; genetic biomarker; manganese superoxide dismutase; muscadine grape skin extract; prostate cancer; randomized controlled clinical trial.
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Enzalutamide and Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the ARCHES Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258751. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8751. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40332939 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Muscadine Grape Skin Extract (MPX) in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jan 15;24(2):306-315. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1100. Epub 2017 Nov 7. Clin Cancer Res. 2018. PMID: 29113986 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of enzalutamide with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) versus ADT alone for the treatment of high-risk biochemically recurrent non-metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in Canada.J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):766-777. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2503660. Epub 2025 May 23. J Med Econ. 2025. PMID: 40395149
-
Prevalence and odds of anxiety and depression in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a proportional meta-analysis and regression.Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jun 20;191(1):24-35. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae011. Br J Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38197404
-
Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel.Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Jul;27(7):2876-2888. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03833-6. Epub 2025 Jan 2. Clin Transl Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39747804 Review.
References
-
- N. I. Simon, C. Parker, T. A. Hope, and C. J. Paller, “Best Approaches and Updates for Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence,” American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book 42 (2022): 352–359.
-
- E. M. Schaeffer, S. Srinivas, N. Adra, et al., “Prostate Cancer, Version 3.2024: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines.2024,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 22, no. 3 (2024): 140–150.
-
- G. M. Duchesne, H. H. Woo, J. K. Bassett, et al., “Timing of Androgen‐Deprivation Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer With a Rising PSA (TROG 03.06 and VCOG PR 01‐03 [TOAD]): A Randomised, Multicentre, Non‐Blinded, Phase 3 Trial,” lancet oncology 17, no. 6 (2016): 727–737.
-
- S. J. Freedland, M. de Almeida Luz, U. De Giorgi, et al., “Improved Outcomes With Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 389, no. 16 (2023): 1453–1465.
-
- P. J. Saylor and M. R. Smith, “Adverse Effects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Defining the Problem and Promoting Health Among Men With Prostate Cancer,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 8, no. 2 (2010): 211–223.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous