Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 14;147(19):16099-16106.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c18303. Epub 2025 May 6.

Sorbent Mediated Electrocatalytic Reduction of Dilute CO2 to Methane

Affiliations

Sorbent Mediated Electrocatalytic Reduction of Dilute CO2 to Methane

Jared S Stanley et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

Efficient CO2 utilization is a critical component of closing the anthropogenic carbon cycle. Most studies have focused on the use of pure streams of CO2. However, CO2 is generally available only in dilute streams, which requires capture by sorbents followed by energy-intensive regeneration to release concentrated CO2. Direct utilization of sorbed-CO2 avoids the costly regeneration step, and the sorbent-CO2 interaction can kinetically activate CO2 to tune its reactivity toward products that could otherwise be inaccessible with direct CO2 reduction. We demonstrate that an N-heterocyclic carbene, 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene (DPIy), quantitatively reacts with CO2 from dilute streams (0.04 and 10%) to form the sorbent-CO2 substrate 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazolium-2-carboxylate (DPICx). Electrocatalyst iron tetraphenylporphyrin chloride (Fe(TPP)Cl) typically reduces CO2 to CO; however, with DPICx as the substrate, the eight-electron reduced product methane (CH4) is produced with a high Faradaic efficiency (>85%) and regeneration of the sorbent DPIy. In addition to the overall energy and capital advantages of integrated CO2 capture and conversion, this result illustrates how sorbents can serve a dual purpose for both CO2 capture and chemical auxiliary purposes to access unique products. CO2 has a spectrum of reactivity with different types of sorbents; thus, these studies demonstrate how sorbent-CO2 interactions can be leveraged for integrated capture and utilization platforms to access a wider range of CO2-derived products.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Chart 1
Chart 1. Structures of Fe(TPP)Cl, DPIy, and DPICx
Figure 1
Figure 1
Controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) of 20 mM DPICx (black) with 1 mM Fe(TPP)Cl (blue) and 60 mM H2O at −2.35 V vs Fe(C5H5)2+/0. CPE experiments were performed in THF with 0.1 M n-Bu4NPF6 on carbon cloth electrodes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
UV-visible spectra of 1 mM Fe(TPP)2– with 20 mM DPICx and 60 mM H2O postelectrolysis (−2.35 V vs Fe(C5H5)2+/0, 4 h) (black) diluted 1:10 with THF and generated spectroelectrochemically (100 μM Fe(TPP)Cl, −2.35 V vs Fe(C5H5)2+/0) (blue). The features below 300 nm in the black trace correspond to DPIy and unreacted DPICx.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Potential intermediates in the reduction of DPICx to formate catalyzed by Fe(TPP)2–. The total spin and approximate localization of unpaired electrons are denoted by red arrows. Diisopropylphenyl groups have been omitted for clarity. Formate is the only experimentally observed C1 intermediate prior to the product CH4 and is only observed by 13C NMR when 13C-labeled DPICx is used.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Potential Substrate Intermediates, Assuming That the Sorbent-CO2 Bond Is Retained Throughout Reduction (Top) or Cleaved Early to Form the Product (Bottom)
The gray CO2 intermediate is not expected to be present because of the strong binding to NHC and because it is never detected under experimental conditions. All black and green intermediates have been tested as substrates under catalytic conditions except DPI-CHO, which could not be isolated (products and Faradaic efficiencies are shown in Table 1). The green intermediate is also detected under catalytic conditions.

References

    1. Balamurugan M.; Merakeb L.; Nam K. T.; Robert M.. Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. In Chemical Valorisation of Carbon Dioxide, Stefanidis G.; Stankiewicz A. Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry, 2022; p 1804.
    1. Francke R.; Schille B.; Roemelt M. Homogeneously Catalyzed Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide—Methods, Mechanisms, and Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (9), 4631–4701. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00459. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deutsch T. G.; Baker S.; Agbo P.; Kauffman D. R.; Vickers J.; Schaidle J. A.. Summary Report of the Reactive CO2 Capture: Process Integration for the New Carbon Economy Workshop, February 18-19, 2020. 2020. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/78466.pdf (accessed 05/01/2024).
    1. Freyman M. C.; Huang Z.; Ravikumar D.; Duoss E. B.; Li Y.; Baker S. E.; Pang S. H.; Schaidle J. A. Reactive CO2 capture: A path forward for process integration in carbon management. Joule 2023, 7 (4), 631–651. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.03.013. - DOI
    1. Van Ausdall B. R.; Glass J. L.; Wiggins K. M.; Aarif A. M.; Louie J. A Systematic Investigation of Factors Influencing the Decarboxylation of Imidazolium Carboxylates. Journal of Organic Chemistry 2009, 74 (20), 7935–7942. 10.1021/jo901791k. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources