Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;55(6):1298-1307.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-025-06249-8. Epub 2025 May 6.

Semiautomatic three-dimensional ultrasound renal volume segmentation in pediatric hydronephrosis: interrater agreement and correlation to conventional hydronephrosis grading

Affiliations

Semiautomatic three-dimensional ultrasound renal volume segmentation in pediatric hydronephrosis: interrater agreement and correlation to conventional hydronephrosis grading

Michael Esser et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2025 May.

Abstract

Background: Two-dimensional (D) assessment of renal volume underestimates the actual value and shows high interobserver variability. Limited data exist on innovative 3-D ultrasound (US) technique for the evaluation of pediatric hydronephrosis.

Objective: To assess the interrater agreement of kidney volume segmentation by 3-D US with a matrix array transducer in children with hydronephrosis and to compare the 3-D metrics to conventional hydronephrosis grading.

Materials and methods: We prospectively acquired 48 renal volumes in 45 patients with hydronephrosis by freehand 3-D US (6-1 MHz volumetric sector array, electronic rotation; median age, 4 years; 1 month to 16 years). Semi-automated kidney segmentation was performed by two independent readers providing volumes for total kidney (renal capsule), dilated collective system, renal parenchyma (renal capsule-collective system) and hydronephrosis index (renal parenchyma/capsule). Interrater agreement was evaluated with Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dice similarity coefficients. The maximum calibre of renal pelvis was measured and hydronephroses were morphologically classified grade 1-4.

Results: Interrater agreement for renal capsule, collective system, hydronephrosis index, and renal parenchyma was good to excellent with ICC of 0.94, 0.87, 0.83 and 0.92 respectively (P < 0.001 each). Median Dice was 0.90 (capsule), 0.77 (collective system) and 0.88 (parenchyma). There was a positive correlation between conventional hydronephrosis grading and ultrasonic hydronephrosis index and between renal pelvis diameter and collective system volume (P < 0.001 both).

Conclusion: Semiautomatic 3-D US volumetric analysis has a high degree of interrater agreement and enables reliable assessment of renal parenchymal volume in hydronephrosis. Volumes of the collective system and hydronephrosis index correlate with the extent of hydronephrosis.

Trial registration: Trial registration number, DRKS00022772; date of registration, 07/31/2020.

Keywords: Hydronephrosis; Imaging, three-dimensional; Kidney diseases; Pediatrics; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: Mr. James R. Jago, PhD is employee of Philips Healthcare. Mrs. Laurence Rouet, PhD is employee of Philips Health Technology Innovation Paris. The study was supported by a research grant in the framework of a collaboration contract with Philips Ultrasound, Inc. Conflicts of interest: The authors confirm that there are no further conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow of the study. Image parameters were adjusted based on the conventional 2-dimensional (D) B-mode ultrasound. Afterward, the 3-D mode display was used to show live side-by-side-image including a sagittal and axial view of the kidney at the same time. After 3-D volume acquisition the multiplanar reformatted (MPR) view highlights the structure in three orthogonal planes and a volume-rendered image. The segmentation was performed independently by two radiologists on a separate workstation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bland-Altmann plot for all renal parenchymal values. Nearly all renal parenchymal volumes were within the limits of agreement as a tolerance range (broken green lines). There is a single outlier below the lower limit of agreement (arrow). SD standard deviation of the differences
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Boxplots of Dice similarity coefficients for total renal volume, collective system, and parenchyma. The highest median values (bold lines) of Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) are found for total renal volume (capsule: median, 0.9) and for the parenchyma (median: 0.88). The collective systems show lower DSCs (median: 0.77) with a relatively wide range (from 0.54 to 0.89). The Dice values for renal parenchyma segmentation are lower than those for capsule segmentation but remain high. Since the delineation of the renal capsule is semi-automatic, its high spatial agreement seems to compensate for the discrepancies in the collective system segmentation. This can also be explained by the fact that the volume of the latter is generally much smaller than that of the former
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Correlation between hydronephrosis indices and clinical grading. Lower values of the hydronephrosis index (renal parenchyma divided by total capsule) are associated with a higher degree of hydronephrosis (P < 0.001)

Similar articles

References

    1. Onen A (2020) Grading of hydronephrosis: an ongoing challenge. Front Pediatr 8:458 - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeFreitas MJ, Katsoufis CP, Infante JC et al (2021) The old becomes new: advances in imaging techniques to assess nephron mass in children. Pediatr Nephrol 36:517–525 - PubMed
    1. Riccabona M, Fritz GA, Schöllnast H et al (2005) Hydronephrotic kidney: pediatric three-dimensional US for relative renal size assessment–initial experience. Radiology 236:276–283 - PubMed
    1. Bakker J, Olree M, Kaatee R et al (1999) Renal volume measurements: accuracy and repeatability of US compared with that of MR imaging. Radiology 211:623–628 - PubMed
    1. Mancini M, Mainenti PP, Speranza A et al (2006) Accuracy of sonographic volume measurements of kidney transplant. J Clin Ultrasound 34:184–189 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources