Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 6:12:e54484.
doi: 10.2196/54484.

Knowledge Sharing Maturity Model for Medical Imaging Departments: Development Study

Maryam Almashmoum  1   2 , James Cunningham  1 , John Ainsworth  1
Affiliations

Knowledge Sharing Maturity Model for Medical Imaging Departments: Development Study

Maryam Almashmoum et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: Knowledge sharing in medical imaging departments is driven by the need to improve health care services, develop health care professionals' skills, and reduce repetitive mistakes. It is considered an important step in the implementation of knowledge management solutions. By following a maturity model of knowledge sharing, knowledge-sharing practices can be improved.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a maturity model for knowledge sharing in the medical imaging department to help managers to assess the level of maturity of knowledge-sharing practices. In modern health care institutions, improvements in health care professionals' skills and health care services are often driven through practicing knowledge-sharing behaviors. Managers can follow the indicators of maturity model of knowledge sharing and its measurements to identify the current level and move to the next level.

Methods: This study was conducted in 4 stages: an overview stage that highlighted the factors that affect knowledge-sharing practices in medical imaging departments; an analysis factor stage that was designed to assess the factors that affect knowledge sharing using a concurrent mixed methods approach (questionnaires and semistructured interviews) in 2 medical imaging departments; a structuring maturity model knowledge sharing stage, where a maturity model of knowledge sharing was developed based on the findings of the first and second stages; and finally, an assessment of reliability and validity stage, where a modified Delphi method was used to obtain consensus among experts on model components to be ready for implantation.

Results: The model presented in this study includes 17 indicators, divided into 11 components. Those components were derived from the findings of the questionnaires and semistructured interviews that were applied in the medical imaging departments. It consisted of 5 maturity levels: initial, aware, defined, managed, and optimized. In each level, measurements were included to help managers assess the current level by answering the questions. On the basis of reliability, the experts reached a consensus agreement on the model's components in 2 rounds with SD <1.

Conclusions: This maturity model of knowledge sharing in medical imaging departments allows managers and policy makers to measure the maturity level of knowledge sharing in those departments. Although the model has been applied to medical imaging departments, it could easily be modified for application in other institutions.

Keywords: KCCC; Kuwait Cancer Control Center; cancer centers; factors; indicators; knowledge management; knowledge sharing; maturity model; measurement; medical imaging departments; the Christie.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The 4 stages conducted in this study. KS: knowledge sharing; MM: maturity model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic description of the 5 components that affect the knowledge sharing maturity model in medical imaging departments. KS: knowledge sharing.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Kogut B, Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ Sci. 1996 Oct;7(5):502–18. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.5.502. - DOI
    1. Mc Evoy PJ, Ragab MA, Arisha A. The effectiveness of knowledge management in the public sector. Knowl Manag Res Pract. 2018 Nov 07;17(1):39–51. doi: 10.1080/14778238.2018.1538670. - DOI
    1. Islam QM. Innovation in primary healthcare in the twenty-first century. J Health Manag. 2021 Mar 31;23(1):129–42. doi: 10.1177/0972063421994987. https://www - DOI
    1. Rego I, Pereira L, Dias Á, Gonçalves R, da Costa RL, Costa A. Knowledge management maturity in healthcare service. Int J Knowl Learn. 2023;16(1):17. doi: 10.1504/ijkl.2023.127335. - DOI
    1. Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci. 1994 Feb;5(1):14–37. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources