Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 6;17(1):99.
doi: 10.1186/s13195-025-01749-z.

"It seems enormously valuable to me." Perspectives of Dutch (potential) carriers of genetic FTD on onset-predictive biomarker testing

Affiliations

"It seems enormously valuable to me." Perspectives of Dutch (potential) carriers of genetic FTD on onset-predictive biomarker testing

Charlotte H Graafland et al. Alzheimers Res Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Onset-predictive biomarker tests (OPBT) in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) may be used to recruit mutation carriers into preventive clinical trials before symptoms manifest. This would require disclosure of OPBT results to potential participants. This study investigates the perspectives of Dutch presymptomatic mutation carriers and individuals at 50% risk of genetic FTD on disclosure of OPBT results. It focuses on their willingness to receive OPBT results, what impacts they foresee from disclosure, and their preferences for the process of disclosure.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with presymptomatic mutation carriers and individuals at 50% risk of developing genetic FTD (n = 25), who had received genetic counselling or participate in a longitudinal cohort study. The interview transcripts were analysed using thematic inductive analysis.

Results: Main themes were: willingness to undergo biomarker testing, foreseen impact of test results, preferences regarding biomarker test features, and understanding of biomarker testing. Most participants would be willing to receive OPBT results in the context of clinical trial recruitment. Participants would also be willing to receive OPBT results without access to clinical trial participation, as they perceived utility from these results. They would use positive OPBT results to prepare for the future, e.g. by planning for care, drawing up advance care directives, retiring early, and spending final healthy years well. At the same time, they thought positive OPBT results might also have negative psychological impacts on self-image or social dynamics with others. Implications of positive OPBT results for self-image as healthy or ill differed between participants. Negative OPBT results would provide relief and not lead to life changes.

Conclusions: Dutch presymptomatic mutation carriers and individuals at 50% risk of developing genetic FTD tend to be willing to receive OPBT results. The results would allow for participation in a clinical trial and preparation for onset through personal life planning. At the same time, disclosure of OPBT results might have negative psychological consequences. This study provides valuable input for developing ethical guidance and an appropriate counselling process to ensure responsible disclosure of OPBT results with clinical trial recruitment.

Keywords: Biomarker; Clinical trial recruitment; Ethics; Frontotemporal dementia; Genetic counselling; Onset prediction; Stakeholder perspectives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The research protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee of Erasmus MC [ref. MEC-2023-0375]. Participants provided written informed consent before the interview. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the themes and subthemes

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Younes K, Miller BL. Frontotemporal dementia: neuropathology, genetics, neuroimaging, and treatments. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2020;43(2):331–44. 10.1016/j.psc.2020.02.006. - PubMed
    1. Johnen A, Bertoux M. Psychological and cognitive markers of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia-a clinical neuropsychologist’s view on diagnostic criteria and beyond. Front Neurol. 2019;10:594. 10.3389/fneur.2019.00594. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russell LL, Rohrer JD. Defining the presymptomatic phase of frontotemporal dementia. Curr Opin Neurol. 2023;36(4):276–82. 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001174. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benussi A, Borroni B. Advances in the treatment and management of frontotemporal dementia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2023;23(7):621–39. 10.1080/14737175.2023.2228491. - PubMed
    1. Neylan KD, Miller BL. New approaches to the treatment of frontotemporal dementia. Neurotherapeutics. 2023;20(4):1055–65. 10.1007/s13311-023-01380-6. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources