"It seems enormously valuable to me." Perspectives of Dutch (potential) carriers of genetic FTD on onset-predictive biomarker testing
- PMID: 40329303
- PMCID: PMC12054206
- DOI: 10.1186/s13195-025-01749-z
"It seems enormously valuable to me." Perspectives of Dutch (potential) carriers of genetic FTD on onset-predictive biomarker testing
Abstract
Background: Onset-predictive biomarker tests (OPBT) in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) may be used to recruit mutation carriers into preventive clinical trials before symptoms manifest. This would require disclosure of OPBT results to potential participants. This study investigates the perspectives of Dutch presymptomatic mutation carriers and individuals at 50% risk of genetic FTD on disclosure of OPBT results. It focuses on their willingness to receive OPBT results, what impacts they foresee from disclosure, and their preferences for the process of disclosure.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with presymptomatic mutation carriers and individuals at 50% risk of developing genetic FTD (n = 25), who had received genetic counselling or participate in a longitudinal cohort study. The interview transcripts were analysed using thematic inductive analysis.
Results: Main themes were: willingness to undergo biomarker testing, foreseen impact of test results, preferences regarding biomarker test features, and understanding of biomarker testing. Most participants would be willing to receive OPBT results in the context of clinical trial recruitment. Participants would also be willing to receive OPBT results without access to clinical trial participation, as they perceived utility from these results. They would use positive OPBT results to prepare for the future, e.g. by planning for care, drawing up advance care directives, retiring early, and spending final healthy years well. At the same time, they thought positive OPBT results might also have negative psychological impacts on self-image or social dynamics with others. Implications of positive OPBT results for self-image as healthy or ill differed between participants. Negative OPBT results would provide relief and not lead to life changes.
Conclusions: Dutch presymptomatic mutation carriers and individuals at 50% risk of developing genetic FTD tend to be willing to receive OPBT results. The results would allow for participation in a clinical trial and preparation for onset through personal life planning. At the same time, disclosure of OPBT results might have negative psychological consequences. This study provides valuable input for developing ethical guidance and an appropriate counselling process to ensure responsible disclosure of OPBT results with clinical trial recruitment.
Keywords: Biomarker; Clinical trial recruitment; Ethics; Frontotemporal dementia; Genetic counselling; Onset prediction; Stakeholder perspectives.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The research protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee of Erasmus MC [ref. MEC-2023-0375]. Participants provided written informed consent before the interview. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Ethics of disclosure of onset-predictive biomarker test results for genetic frontotemporal dementia in the research context.Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025 Jun 11;17(2):e70133. doi: 10.1002/dad2.70133. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025. PMID: 40502924 Free PMC article.
-
Altered levels of CSF proteins in patients with FTD, presymptomatic mutation carriers and non-carriers.Transl Neurodegener. 2020 Jun 23;9(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40035-020-00198-y. Transl Neurodegener. 2020. PMID: 32576262 Free PMC article.
-
Single-subject classification of presymptomatic frontotemporal dementia mutation carriers using multimodal MRI.Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jul 17;20:188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.07.014. eCollection 2018. Neuroimage Clin. 2018. PMID: 30094168 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive genetic testing for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia: genetic counselling considerations.Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2017 Nov;18(7-8):475-485. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2017.1332079. Epub 2017 Jun 6. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2017. PMID: 28585888 Review.
-
Genetic counseling for frontotemporal dementias.J Mol Neurosci. 2011 Nov;45(3):706-9. doi: 10.1007/s12031-011-9557-8. Epub 2011 May 26. J Mol Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21614537 Review.
Cited by
-
Ethics of disclosure of onset-predictive biomarker test results for genetic frontotemporal dementia in the research context.Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025 Jun 11;17(2):e70133. doi: 10.1002/dad2.70133. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025. PMID: 40502924 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Younes K, Miller BL. Frontotemporal dementia: neuropathology, genetics, neuroimaging, and treatments. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2020;43(2):331–44. 10.1016/j.psc.2020.02.006. - PubMed
-
- Benussi A, Borroni B. Advances in the treatment and management of frontotemporal dementia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2023;23(7):621–39. 10.1080/14737175.2023.2228491. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources