Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 7;7(1):25.
doi: 10.1186/s42836-025-00310-5.

Comparative effects of mechanical and functional alignment in bilateral robotic total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Thakrit Chompoosang  1 , Utain Ketkaewsuwan  1 , Patcharavit Ploynumpon  2
Affiliations

Comparative effects of mechanical and functional alignment in bilateral robotic total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Thakrit Chompoosang et al. Arthroplasty. .

Abstract

Background: Functional alignment (FA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can achieve soft tissue balance by fine-tuning adjustments of bony resections and component alignment with less soft tissue release. However, joint line orientation relative to the floor in the knee and ankle after TKA is not well studied.

Methods: A randomized-controlled trial was performed in 30 patients with robotic-assisted bilateral TKA using FA and mechanical alignment (MA) in the same patient. The outcome measures were as follows: (1) standing radiographic knee and ankle alignment; (2) clinical outcomes at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively (including forgotten joint score (FJS), KOOS, knee range of motion); (3) patient satisfaction score; and (4) soft tissue release.

Results: Postoperative hip-knee-ankle angles between the FA and MA groups were similar (2.4° versus 2.4°, P = 0.952). Knee joint line orientation was significantly more parallel to the floor in the FA group (3.0° versus 4.7°, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in ankle joint line orientation relative to the floor in the FA and MA groups (91.0° versus 92.4°, P = 0.099 for tibial plafond inclination and 92.5° versus 93.2°, P = 0.564 for talar dome inclination). However, in knees with preoperative varus with apex distal joint line orientation (coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification type I), FA significantly achieved a more parallel knee and ankle joint line orientation relative to the floor (3.1° versus 5.1°, P = 0.002 for knee and 91.0° versus 93.5°, P = 0.028 for tibial plafond inclination). FA can obtain a balanced knee with significantly lower posteromedial releases (23.3% versus 76.7%, P < 0.001), with no superficial MCL release needed (0% versus 6.67%, P < 0.01). The FA group achieved significantly higher FJS at 3 months (53.3 versus 46.0, P = 0.015) and 6 months (67.8 versus 57.8, P < 0.001) with a higher patient satisfaction score (79.2 versus 84.3, P = 0.001).

Conclusion: Functional alignment can control the overall lower limb alignment similarly to mechanical alignment, with a knee joint line more parallel to the floor. Additionally, the ankle joint line was more parallel in knees with CPAK type I. FA can also provide a more balanced knee with less soft tissue release, a higher functional score, and greater patient satisfaction compared to mechanical alignment.

Keywords: Functional alignment; Mechanical alignment; Robotic-assisted surgery; Soft tissue release; Total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval Consent to participate: The author received approval from the Ethics Board Committee of Rajavithi Hospital (Ethics ID: 66156). All participants gave informed consent to a physician preoperatively. Clinical trial registration number: NCT06259032. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to Publication: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication. Competing Interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Radiographic measurements: (a) knee joint line orientation (KJLO) angle, which had a positive value when the joint line was slanted down to the lateral side; (b) Tibial inclination, talar inclination, and tibiotalar tilt angle
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT flow diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO) by Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Example of CPAK 1
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Example of CPAK 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ritter MA. The Anatomical Graduated Component total knee replacement: A long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British volume. 2009 Jun;91-B(6):745–9. - PubMed
    1. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Who is Satisfied and Who is Not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):57–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3854–60. - PubMed
    1. Victor JMK, Bassens D, Bellemans J, Gürsu S, Dhollander AAM, Verdonk PCM. Constitutional Varus Does Not Affect Joint Line Orientation in the Coronal Plane. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):98–104. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ji HM, Han J, Jin DS, Seo H, Won YY. Kinematically aligned TKA can align knee joint line to horizontal. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(8):2436–41. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources