Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Aug;85(11):1016-1023.
doi: 10.1002/pros.24910. Epub 2025 May 6.

Multicenter External Validation and Optimization of a Proposed Nomogram for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Accuracy in Biochemical Recurrence

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Multicenter External Validation and Optimization of a Proposed Nomogram for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Accuracy in Biochemical Recurrence

Laura Chamorro Castillo et al. Prostate. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has been established as the standard imaging technique after biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa). However, its availability is not widespread, thus, patient selection criteria are necessary. For this reason, a European nomogram was recently developed with the intention of helping to predict and identify those patients with BCR at high risk for a positive PSMA PET/CT. The aim of our study was to test the external validity of this nomogram in a large regional cohort of patients and its impact as a selective tool for patients with BCR who should undergo a PSMA PET/CT.

Methodology: A multicenter, observational, and retrospective study to validate, calibrate, and readjust the European PSMA PET/CT positivity prediction nomogram in a cohort of patients with BCR after radical treatments for localized PCa. Clinical and demographic data were analyzed. We evaluated the detection rate of PSMA PET/CT, the association of different variables with a positive PSMA PET/CT, and the accuracy of the nomogram, summarized in an ROC curve and a clinical decision curve. The nomogram was then modified and improved for our cohort.

Results: A cohort of 413 patients with BCR undergoing PSMA PET/CT was evaluated. Median age, PSA, and PSAdt were 66 years, 0.52 ng/mL, and 7 months, respectively. Median time to BCR was 34 months and the predominant ISUP was 3 (31%). Most patients underwent radical prostatectomy (88%). PSMA PET/CT was positive in 67% of patients, with pelvic involvement in 32% and 24% positivity outside the pelvis. The independent variables associated with a positive PSMA PET/CT were PSA value (OR: 1.94 (1.2-3.19), with a PSA level ≥ 0.5 ng/dL), and a PSA persistence after primary treatment (OR 2.95 (95% CI 1.37-7.14)). The original nomogram had a low predictive ability, with an AUC of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.62). It was necessary to adjust and calibrate this to obtain a novel nomogram with an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.70-0.98). The DCA showed a greater net benefit from the use of this nomogram at intermediate threshold levels.

Conclusion: The nomogram showed a low predictive ability in our external validation. Nevertheless, our novel nomogram demonstrated a moderate-high predictive ability, which could thus optimize the selection of BCR patients who are candidates for PSMA PET/CT.

Keywords: PSMA PET/CT; biochemical recurrence; external validation; nomogram; prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. P. Cornford, R. C. N. van den Bergh, E. Briers, et al., “EAU‐EANM‐ESTRO‐ESUR‐SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II—2020 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer,” European Urology 79, no. 2 (February 2021): 263–282.
    1. M. C. Abramowitz, T. Li, M. K. Buyyounouski, et al., “The Phoenix Definition of Biochemical Failure Predicts for Overall Survival in Patients With Prostate Cancer,” Cancer 112, no. 1 (2008): 55–60.
    1. M. W. Kattan, T. M. Wheeler, and P. T. Scardino, “Postoperative Nomogram for Disease Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 17, no. 5 (May 1999): 1499.
    1. A. Nini, G. Gandaglia, N. Fossati, et al., “Patterns of Clinical Recurrence of Node‐Positive Prostate Cancer and Impact on Long‐Term Survival,” European Urology 68, no. 5 (November 2015): 777–784.
    1. P. Ost, A. Bossi, K. Decaestecker, et al., “Metastasis‐Directed Therapy of Regional and Distant Recurrences After Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” European Urology 67, no. 5 (May 2015): 852–863.

MeSH terms