Family Experiences of Integrated Care for Children With Medical Complexity: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 40329672
- PMCID: PMC12056461
- DOI: 10.1111/cch.70091
Family Experiences of Integrated Care for Children With Medical Complexity: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Background: Children with medical complexity (CMC) frequently access multiple healthcare services across often fragmented systems. Paediatric integrated care models (PICMs) support health care coordination, but little is known about experiences and perceived benefits and barriers among CMC, parents or carers while accessing PICMs. This review addresses these knowledge gaps by synthesising current published evidence.
Methods: A scoping literature review based on searches of four databases: Medline, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL (2015-2024). Articles reporting on experiences of accessing PICMs by CMC aged < 19 years, their parents or carers were included. Data were extracted and thematically synthesised to describe experiences and perceived benefits and barriers.
Results: The seven included papers reported on the experiences of parents (mostly mothers, 89%); only one paper included the views of CMC and siblings. All seven papers described the benefits of PICMs, including greater attention to individualised needs, smoother system navigation facilitated by care coordinators and improved communication and information sharing among care teams. Four papers reported barriers including limited understanding among parents and carers of care coordinator roles and processes and pathways of PICMs. Systemic barriers limited medical records sharing across providers and settings, and in two studies, parents raised this as a risk for care quality and safety for their CMC. Other systemic barriers identified by parents included a lack of stable funding for new models of care and difficulties linking PICMs with primary care, social care and education sectors.
Conclusions: The evidence on experiences, benefits and barriers of PICMs among CMC, families and carers is scarce, and the voices of CMC are largely absent. The greater involvement of CMC, their parents and carers in the design and ongoing evaluation of PICMs should be a priority to improve family-centred integrated care for CMC.
Keywords: care experiences; children with medical complexity; family‐centred care; integrated care; models of care.
© 2025 The Author(s). Child: Care, Health and Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Between equilibrium and chaos, with little restitution: a narrative analysis of qualitative interviews with clinicians and parent carers of children with medical complexity.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10973-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38654202 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
A qualitative study investigating the experiences of unmet social needs for children with cerebral palsy and their families: perspectives of parents and clinicians.Disabil Rehabil. 2025 May;47(9):2278-2287. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2391557. Epub 2024 Aug 18. Disabil Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 39155439
-
Access to primary care for children and young people (CYP) in the UK: a scoping review of CYP's, caregivers' and healthcare professionals' views and experiences of facilitators and barriers.BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e081620. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081620. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38816045 Free PMC article.
-
Service design for children and young people with common mental health problems: literature review, service mapping and collective case study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(13):1-181. doi: 10.3310/DKRT6293. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 38767587 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical