Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 22:15:1579950.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1579950. eCollection 2025.

Yeast protein as a fishmeal substitute: impacts on reproductive performance, immune responses, and gut microbiota in two sow hybrids

Pan Zhou #  1 , Qi Liu #  1 , Yang Zhao #  2 , Yachao Wu  1 , Jianbo Shen  1 , Tao Duan  1 , Long Che  3 , Yong Zhang  1 , Honglin Yan  1
Affiliations

Yeast protein as a fishmeal substitute: impacts on reproductive performance, immune responses, and gut microbiota in two sow hybrids

Pan Zhou et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Introduction: The persistent African swine fever epidemic has significantly compromised China's swine production. To accelerate production recovery, commercial farms are increasingly adopting retention of two-way backcross sows (Landrace × Yorkshire × Landrace, LLY) for breeding. This study aimed to investigate the effects of yeast protein, an emerging sustainable protein source, on reproductive performance, immune responses, and gut microbiota in two-way crossbred sows (Landrace × Yorkshire, LY) and LLY sows.

Methods: The experiment employed a 2×2 factorial design evaluating two fixed factors: sow hybrid (LY vs LLY) and yeast protein supplementation (0% vs 2.6%). The four treatment groups were: LY sows without yeast protein supplementation (LY-C), LLY sows without yeast protein supplementation (LLY-C), LY sows with yeast protein supplementation (LY-YP), and LLY sows with yeast protein supplementation (LLY-YP). A total of one hundred healthy sows of 2-6 parities (50 LY sows and 50 LLY sows), were stratified by backfat thickness, body weight, and parity, then randomly allocated to the four treatment groups on day 105 of gestation, with 25 sows in each group. The experimental period lasted from day 106 of gestation to day 18 of lactation.

Results and conclusion: Yeast protein supplementation showed no significant effects on most reproductive parameters of different sow hybrids, but reduced backfat loss by 30.5% during lactation (P < 0.05) and demonstrated a numerical reduction in mummification rate of fetuses (P = 0.06). Immunological assessments revealed that LLY sows exhibited 26.8% lower serum IgM concentration than LY sows (P < 0.05), while yeast protein supplementation significantly reduced serum IL-1β levels by 45.6% (P < 0.05) on day 18 of lactation. 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis revealed comparable fecal microbial diversity across treatments (P > 0.05), though differences were observed in certain bacterial genera between LY and LLY sows during late gestation and lactation. Yeast protein supplementation enriched beneficial bacteria including Ruminococcaceae_UCG-002, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, and Christensenellaceae_R_7_group, while suppressing potentially detrimental bacteria such as Family_XIII_AD3011_group (P < 0.05). These findings demonstrate the practical feasibility of retaining LLY sows for commercial breeding. Yeast protein supplementation, as a substitute for fishmeal during late gestation and lactation, significantly reduced lactational backfat loss, moderately attenuated inflammatory response, and enhanced gut microbiome homeostasis through selective microbial enrichment in sows.

Keywords: gut microbiota; immune response; reproductive performance; sow hybrid; yeast protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Alpha diversity index of fecal microbiota in two sow hybrids at different stages. (A) 113G, day 113 of gestation. (B) 3L, day 3 of lactation. (C) 18L, day 18 of lactation. LY, Landrace × Yorkshire; LLY, Landrace × Yorkshire × Landrace.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of bacterial communities in two sow hybrids. (A) 113G, day 113 of gestation. (B) 3L, day 3 of lactation. (C) 18L, day 18 of lactation. LY, Landrace × Yorkshire; LLY, Landrace × Yorkshire × Landra.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative abundances of top 10 bacteria at levels of phyla (A) and genera (B) in two sow hybrids at different stages. LY, Landrace × Yorkshire; LLY, Landrace × Yorkshire × Landrace; 113G, day 113 of gestation; 3L, day 3 of lactation; 18L, day 18 of lactation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Analysis of differential bacterial genera in fecal microbiota of two sow hybrids at different stages. (A) 113G, day 113 of gestation. (B) 3L, day 3 of lactation. (C) 18L, day 18 of lactation. LY, Landrace × Yorkshire; LLY, Landrace × Yorkshire × Landrace.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The effect of yeast protein supplementation on the alpha diversity index of fecal microbiota in sows at different stages. (A) 113G, day 113 of gestation. (B) 3L, day 3 of lactation. (C) 18L, day 18 of lactation. C, sows fed with control diet; Y, sows fed with yeast protein-supplemented diet.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of bacterial communities in sows fed either a control diet or a yeast protein-supplemented diet. (A) 113G, day 113 of gestation. (B) 3L, day 3 of lactation. (C) 18L, day 18 of lactation. C, sows fed with control diet; Y, sows fed with yeast protein-supplemented diet.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Relative abundances of top 10 bacteria at levels of phyla (A) and genera (B) in sows fed either a control diet or a yeast protein-supplemented diet at different stages. C, sows fed with control diet; Y, sows fed with yeast protein-supplemented diet.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The effect of yeast protein supplementation on the differential bacterial genera in fecal microbiota of sows at different stages. (A) 113G, day 113 of gestation. (B) 3L, day 3 of lactation. (C) 18L, day 18 of lactation. C, sows fed with control diet; Y, sows fed with yeast protein-supplemented diet.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Agboola J. O., Øverland M., Skrede A., Hansen J. Ø. (2021). Yeast as major protein-rich ingredient in aquafeeds: a review of the implications for aquaculture production. Rev. Aquaculture 13, 949–970. doi: 10.1111/raq.12507 - DOI
    1. Bai D., Zhao J., Wang R., Du J., Zhou C., Gu C., et al. . (2024). Eubacterium coprostanoligenes alleviates chemotherapy-induced intestinal mucositis by enhancing intestinal mucus barrier. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 14, 1677–1692. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.12.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barathan M., Ng S. L., Lokanathan Y., Ng M. H., Law J. X.. (2024). The profound influence of gut microbiome and extracellular vesicles on animal health and disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 4024. doi: 10.3390/ijms25074024 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bass B. E., Tsai T. C., Yang H., Perez V., Holzgraefe D., Chewning J., et al. . (2019). Influence of a whole yeast product (Pichia guilliermondii) fed throughout gestation and lactation on performance and immune parameters of the sow and litter. J. Anim. Sci. 97, 1671–1678. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz060 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bi S., Zhang J., Zhang L., Huang K., Li J., Cao L.. (2022). Yeast cell wall upregulated cell-mediated immune responses to Newcastle disease virus vaccine. Poultry Sci. 101, 101712. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101712 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources