Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 6;13(5):e6744.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006744. eCollection 2025 May.

Pilot Study: RoboticScope (Robotic Microscope)-assisted Primary Cleft Palate Surgery

Affiliations

Pilot Study: RoboticScope (Robotic Microscope)-assisted Primary Cleft Palate Surgery

Jonathan Mokhtar et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Background: Conventional palatoplasty involves operating in a narrow oral cavity space with surgical loupe visualization. Today, some surgeons resort to surgical microscopes to improve visualization and obtain more precise muscle dissection. The RoboticScope is a head movement-controlled system that moves the robotic arm loaded with 3-dimensional visualization technology, allowing surgeons complete freedom to use their hands during surgery.

Methods: This was a retrospective pilot analysis of 8 pediatric patients, split into 2 cohorts of 4, comparing conventional palatoplasty to RoboticScope-assisted palatoplasty performed in 2023. Patient demographics collected included age, sex, and cleft palate classification (Veau I-IV). Variables measured included operative time, postoperative analgesia, oral intake, hospital stay, and complication rates. Ergonomic evaluations were performed through surgeons documenting their feedback on comfort and surgical efficiency, including dissection and repair.

Results: RoboticScope-assisted palatoplasty averaged 28 minutes longer than the conventional method. Postoperative analgesic needs also differed: 100% of the patients who underwent conventional palatoplasty required morphine, whereas only 50% of the RoboticScope patients required morphine. Seventy-five percent of the RoboticScope patients demonstrated good oral intake on day 1, and 50% of the patients were discharged 1 day earlier than the conventional group.

Conclusions: This study concludes that RoboticScope-assisted palatoplasty is safe and feasible, and is associated with fewer analgesic needs, better oral intake, and ergonomic benefits for surgeons than conventional palatoplasty. However, due to the limited nature of the study sample, future multicenter studies with a larger cohort group would be essential to validate these outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. Disclosure statements are at the end of this article, following the correspondence information.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
RoboticScope technology. A, Image of RoboticScope’s 6-axis robotic arm and HMD system. Image provided by BHS Technologies (GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). Copyright 2024 BHS Technologies. B, Illustration showing the user interface of the RoboticScope, allowing intuitive control through head gestures. Image provided by BHS Technologies (GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). Copyright 2024 BHS Technologies.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Bar chart illustrating the duration of operations in the RoboticScope and conventional palatoplasty cohorts.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Bar chart comparing postoperative analgesic requirements between the RoboticScope and conventional palatoplasty cohorts.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Pie chart depicting postoperative oral intake outcomes in the RoboticScope and conventional palatoplasty cohorts.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Visual representation of the intraoperative surgical field using the RoboticScope.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Illustration of intraoperative surgeon ergonomics during RoboticScope-assisted procedures.

Similar articles

References

    1. Denadai R, Lo LJ. Reducing delayed detection of isolated cleft palate-related deformity: a call for routine intraoral examination of newborns. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2024;100:350–359. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. . Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766–781. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Penny C, McGuire C, Bezuhly M. A systematic review of feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59:1527–1536. - PubMed
    1. Rivero-Moreno Y, Echevarria S, Vidal-Valderrama C, et al. . Robotic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature and current trends. Cureus. 2023;15:e42370. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardach J, Salyer KE. Surgical Techniques in Cleft Lip and Palate. Year Book Medical Publishers; 1987.

LinkOut - more resources