Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 6;17(4):e81795.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.81795. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Efficacy of High-Dose Statins in Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Post-cardiac Catheterization

Affiliations
Review

Efficacy of High-Dose Statins in Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Post-cardiac Catheterization

Montaser Elkholy et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is defined as an increase in serum creatinine (s-CR) of at least 0.5 mg/dL or a 25% or greater increase from baseline within 48-72 hours of contrast agent administration. High-dose statins have been proposed as a prophylactic measure against CIN. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of peri-procedurally administered high-dose statins in preventing CIN in patients who underwent cardiac catheterization. A comprehensive literature review of PubMed and Embase was conducted with a distinct focus on studies published in the last 15 years up to June 2024. The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the impact of high-dose statin treatment during or around the time of cardiac catheterization on the rate of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). It excluded trials comparing low-dose statins or statins used in non-cardiac surgeries, as well as studies with missing data or unclear end points on CIN. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose statins administered peri-angiography to prevent CIN. Random effects were used using the DerSimonian and Laird method. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of high-dose statins in preventing CIN in patients on chronic statin therapy. Our pooled analysis of 2,312 participants revealed a significantly lower incidence of CIN (odds ratio (OR): 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0.72, P = 0.0007, I2: 38%) in the high-dose statin group compared to the control group. However, the subgroup analysis showed no benefit of high-dose statins in decreasing the incidence of CIN in individuals already on chronic statin therapy (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.33-3.18, P = 0.97). Our study highlights the beneficial effect of high-dose statins in preventing CIN in statin-naive patients. However, no benefit was observed in patients who were on chronic statin therapy.

Keywords: chronic statin therapy; contrast-induced nephropathy; high-dose statins; outcome; percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram Illustrating the Identification, Screening, Selection, and Inclusion of Studies for Final Analysis
PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest Plot of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Incidence in High-Dose Statins Versus Control
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest Plot of Subgroup Analysis of the Effect of High-Dose Statins on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Incidence in Patients Already on Chronic Statin Therapy
Figure 4
Figure 4. Cochrane RoB Tool Assessment for the Included RCTs
Leoncini et al. [17], Abaci et al. [18], de Oliveira et al. [19], Bidram et al. [20], Patti et al. [21], Quintavalle et al. [22], Syed et al. [23], Khosravi et al. [24], Shehata et al. [25], Hammami et al. [13], Watanabe et al. [26] RoB: Risk of Bias, RCTs: randomized controlled trials

References

    1. Reports on contrast media reactions: analysis of data from reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Lasser EC, Lyon SG, Berry CC. Radiology. 1997;203:605–610. - PubMed
    1. Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Mehran R, Nikolsky E. Kidney Int Suppl. 2006:0–5. - PubMed
    1. Contemporary incidence, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the NCDR Cath-PCI registry. Tsai TT, Patel UD, Chang TI, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simple pre-procedure risk stratification tool for contrast-induced nephropathy. Ni Z, Liang Y, Xie N, et al. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11:1597–1610. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a review of definition, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention and treatment. Li Y, Wang J. BMC Nephrol. 2024;25:140. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources