Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 5;8(5):e70815.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70815. eCollection 2025 May.

Economic Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review

Hasan Abolghasem Gorji  1 , Sajad Moeini  1 , Mohmmad Veysi Sheikhrobat  1 , Aziz Rezapour  2 , Aghdas Souresrafil  3 , Mohammad Barzegar  4
Affiliations
Review

Economic Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review

Hasan Abolghasem Gorji et al. Health Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a prevalent cause of lower abdominal pain, often leading patients to seek emergency department care, particularly among young individuals. The present study aimed to systematically review cost-effectiveness studies focusing on therapeutic interventions for AA.

Method: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed economic evaluations of AA treatments published between 2000 and 2020. We searched multiple databases, including Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The studies included in this review were assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) checklist, and cost data were standardized to 2022 US dollars.

Results: Out of the 53 screened studies, 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The studies' average QHES score was of high quality (0.87). Most studies were from the payer's perspective and the health system (four studies each). Five studies were based on the decision tree model, and three were based on the Markov model. Four studies were conducted on children. Of the 11 studies reviewed, five support the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy, five support the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic therapy, and one supports the cost-effectiveness of open appendectomy.

Conclusions: Based on the findings of this study, laparoscopic therapeutic intervention, compared to open appendectomy, can be more cost-effective for the treatment of patients with AA.

Keywords: acute appendicitis; cost‐effectiveness; economic evaluation; laparoscopic appendectomy; open appendectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart for study selection.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Cervellin G., Mora R., Ticinesi A., et al., “Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Abdominal Pain in a Large Urban Emergency Department: Retrospective Analysis of 5,340 Cases,” Annals of Translational Medicine 4 (2016): 362. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Partecke L. I., von Bernstorff W., Karrasch A., et al., “Unexpected Findings on Laparoscopy for Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Pro for Laparoscopic Appendectomy as the Standard Procedure for Acute Appendicitis,” Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 395 (2010): 1069–1076, 10.1007/s00423-009-0567-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kurtz R. J. and Heimann T. M., “Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Treatment of Acute Appendicitis,” American Journal of Surgery 182 (2001): 211–214. - PubMed
    1. Bhangu A., Søreide K., Di Saverio S., Assarsson J. H., and Drake F. T., “Acute Appendicitis: Modern Understanding of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management,” Lancet 386 (2015): 1278–1287. - PubMed
    1. Gomes C. A., Abu‐Zidan F. M., Sartelli M., et al., “Management of Appendicitis Globally Based on Income of Countries (MAGIC) Study,” World Journal of Surgery 42 (2018): 3903–3910. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources