Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 5;8(5):e70817.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70817. eCollection 2025 May.

Comparison of the Safety and Effectiveness of Labor Induction With 25 μg Versus 50 μg of Oral Misoprostol in Women With Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Comparison of the Safety and Effectiveness of Labor Induction With 25 μg Versus 50 μg of Oral Misoprostol in Women With Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Erfane Ebadi et al. Health Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background and aims: The recommended dosing regimens for oral misoprostol in labor induction include 25 μg every 2 h and 50 μg every 4 h. However, there is no specific protocol for these regimens at Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the two dosing protocols for labor induction in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and establish a tailored protocol to minimize maternal and neonatal complications.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital from 2021 to 2023, including pregnant women with term singleton pregnancies and confirmed PROM. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 25 μg of oral misoprostol every 2 h (up to 12 doses) or 50 μg every 4 h (up to 6 doses). The primary outcome was the mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included induction-to-delivery time, uterine tachysystole, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal complications. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and t-tests for comparisons between groups.

Results: A total of 400 women were enrolled, with 200 in each group. The mean induction-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the 50 μg group (p = 0.001). Uterine tachysystole and postpartum hemorrhage due to atonia were more frequent in the 25 μg group (p < 0.05). The rates of cesarean and instrumental deliveries did not differ significantly between groups. The mean ± SD age was 27.1 ± 5.27 years in the 25 μg group and 26.8 ± 5.11 years in the 50 μg group (p = 0.639).

Conclusion: Both dosing regimens of oral misoprostol were effective for labor induction, but the 50 μg dose was associated with a shorter induction-to-delivery time. The findings suggest that adjusting the misoprostol dosage may reduce complications. Clinical Trial Registration Code: IRCT20221123056587N1.

Keywords: childbirth; misoprostol; pregnancy complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design in our study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The mean duration of labor induction between two groups based on parity of patients.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sharma M., Agrwal M., and Goudappagoudra H., “Maternal and Fetal Outcome in Preterm Premature Rupture of Membrane,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 10, no. 11 (2021): 4178–4183.
    1. Ismail A. Q. T. and Lahiri S., “Management of Prelabour Rupture of Membranes (PROM) at Term,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine 41, no. 6 (2013): 647–649. - PubMed
    1. Olita'a D., Barnabas R., Vali Boma G., Pameh W., Vince J., and Duke T., “Simplified Management Protocol for Term Neonates After Prolonged Rupture of Membranes in a Setting With High Rates of Neonatal Sepsis and Mortality: A Quality Improvement Study,” Archives of Disease in Childhood 104, no. 2 (2019): 115–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yasmina A. and Barakat A., “Prelabour Rupture of Membranes (PROM) at Term: Prognostic Factors and Neonatal Consequences,” Pan African Medical Journal 26 (2017): 68–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsakiridis I., Mamopoulos A., Athanasiadis A., and Dagklis T., “Induction of Labor: An Overview of Guidelines,” Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 75, no. 1 (2020): 61–72. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources