Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 22:12:1570041.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1570041. eCollection 2025.

The emerging role of next-generation sequencing in minimal residual disease assessment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review of current literature

Affiliations

The emerging role of next-generation sequencing in minimal residual disease assessment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review of current literature

Andreea-Iulia Ștefan et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a critical prognostic marker in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The well studied and used MRD detection methods, multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for fusion genes and receptor gene rearrangements have significantly improved risk stratification, but have limitations in sensitivity and applicability. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a promising approach for MRD assessment, offering better sensitivity and the ability to track clonal evolution.

Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the clinical utility and prognostic value of NGS for MRD detection in ALL, comparing its performance with conventional methods and exploring its potential role in therapeutic guidance.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they assessed MRD using NGS in ALL patients and provided data on sensitivity and prognostic value. Comparative analyses with MFC or qRT-PCR were considered. Data on end-of-induction MRD values, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted.

Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. NGS demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting MRD-positive cases compared to MFC in patients classified as MRD-negative. Higher correlation was observed in MRD-positive cases than in MRD-negative cases. NGS-based MRD stratification correlated strongly with clinical outcomes, with patients achieving NGS-MRD negativity exhibiting superior EFS and OS rates. Additionally, NGS was highly predictive of relapse following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and CAR-T cell therapy. The IGH rearrangements as the primary marker in NGS panels has demonstrated good prognostic value in B-ALL.

Conclusion: NGS represents a transformative tool for MRD monitoring in ALL, offering enhanced sensitivity and prognostic accuracy. Challenges such as high costs, complex bioinformatics analysis and the need for standardization remain. While its integration into clinical practice holds significant promise, further research is needed to establish standardized protocols, cost-effectiveness, and its optimal role in treatment decision-making. The combination of NGS with MFC may provide complementary advantages.

Keywords: acute lymphoblastic leukemia; event-free survival; minimal residual disease; next-generation sequencing; relapse prediction; risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewers ABT and DG declared a past co-authorship with the author AC to the handling editor.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PRISMA flow diagram.

References

    1. American Cancer Society Key statistics for acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). (2025). Available online at https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/acute-lymphocytic-leukemia/about/key... (accessed March 2, 2025).
    1. Terwilliger T, Abdul-Hay M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update. Blood. Cancer J. (2017) 7:53. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.53, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunger SP, Lu X, Devidas M, Camitta BM, Gaynon PS, Winick NJ, et al. . Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children’s oncology group. J Clin Oncol. (2012) 30:1663–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8018, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JW, Cho B. Prognostic factors and treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Korean. J Pediatr. (2017) 60:129–37. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2017.60.5.129, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. (2008) 371:1030–43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60457-2 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources